Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Delaware opinions name it 3 courts 2016–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Delaware courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Onti, Inc. v. Integra Bankgreen2 sentences2016Turning to VanVleet’s guideline public company valuation, Shannon Pratt notes that the more actively traded the chosen guideline companies, the better, and that “confidence [in a guideline analysis] rises sharply when we can find four to 114 See JX 109. 115 Van Vleet Report ¶ 116. 116 See JX 126. 117 See Resp’t’s Post-Trial Opening Br. at 55 n.21 (footnote defense of Van Vleet’s choice of a Maryland bank); see generally Resp’t’s Answering Br. (no defense of the M&A method). 118 See, e.g., ONTI, Inc. v. Integra Bank, 751 A.2d 904, 915-16 (Del. 2016Turning to VanVleet’s guideline public company valuation, Shannon Pratt notes that the more actively traded the chosen guideline companies, the better, and that “confidence [in a guideline analysis] rises sharply when we can find four to 114 See JX 109. 115 Van Vleet Report ¶ 116. 116 See JX 126. 117 See Resp’t’s Post-Trial Opening Br. at 55 n.21 (footnote defense of Van Vleet’s choice of a Maryland bank); see generally Resp’t’s Answering Br. (no defense of the M&A method). 118 See, e.g., ONTI, Inc. v. Integra Bank, 751 A.2d 904, 915-16 (Del. | 2 | 2 |
Leacock v. Stategreen1 sentence2023Under Delaware law, a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary guilty plea constitutes a waiver of the defendant’s right to challenge any errors occurring before the entry of the plea.2 The record reflects that Hopkins’s plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. (8) In the Truth-in-Sentencing Guilty Plea form, Hopkins indicated that he understood he was waiving certain constitutional rights, including his right to 1 Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988); Leacock v. State, 690 A.2d 926, 927-28 (Del. 1996). 2 Miller v. State, 840 A.2d 1229, 1232 (Del. 2003); Downer v. State, 543 A.2d 309 , 312–1 | 1 | 1 |
Fonville v. Stategreen1 sentence2023Our review of a sentence is “limited to whether the sentence is within the statutory limits prescribed by the General Assembly and whether it is based on factual predicates 3 Somerville v. State, 703 A.2d 629, 632 (Del. 1997). 4 See, e.g., Fonville v. State, 2015 WL 5968251, at *2 (Del. | 1 | 1 |
Penson v. Ohiogreen1 sentence2023Under Delaware law, a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary guilty plea constitutes a waiver of the defendant’s right to challenge any errors occurring before the entry of the plea.2 The record reflects that Hopkins’s plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. (8) In the Truth-in-Sentencing Guilty Plea form, Hopkins indicated that he understood he was waiving certain constitutional rights, including his right to 1 Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988); Leacock v. State, 690 A.2d 926, 927-28 (Del. 1996). 2 Miller v. State, 840 A.2d 1229, 1232 (Del. 2003); Downer v. State, 543 A.2d 309 , 312–1 | 1 | 1 |
Somerville v. Stategreen1 sentence2023Our review of a sentence is “limited to whether the sentence is within the statutory limits prescribed by the General Assembly and whether it is based on factual predicates 3 Somerville v. State, 703 A.2d 629, 632 (Del. 1997). 4 See, e.g., Fonville v. State, 2015 WL 5968251, at *2 (Del. | 1 | 1 |
Miller v. Stategreen1 sentence2023Under Delaware law, a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary guilty plea constitutes a waiver of the defendant’s right to challenge any errors occurring before the entry of the plea.2 The record reflects that Hopkins’s plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. (8) In the Truth-in-Sentencing Guilty Plea form, Hopkins indicated that he understood he was waiving certain constitutional rights, including his right to 1 Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988); Leacock v. State, 690 A.2d 926, 927-28 (Del. 1996). 2 Miller v. State, 840 A.2d 1229, 1232 (Del. 2003); Downer v. State, 543 A.2d 309 , 312–1 | 1 | 1 |
Savor, Inc. v. FMR Corp.green1 sentence2018Now Defendants petition this Court to revisit its decision, arguing that the Court misunderstood the facts and overlooked a controlling legal principle. l Savor Inc. v. FMR Corp., 812 A.2d 894, 896-97 (Del. 2002) (on a motion to dismiss “all well- pleaded factual allegations are accepted as true.”). 2 Janet Batchelor v. Alexis Properties, LLC et al K17C-11-001 NEP April 3, 2018 Specifically, with regard to argument two (2), Defendants argue the Court incorrectly determined that Plaintiff sufficiently pled damages, because the elements of malicious prosecution require an allegation of special i | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Delaware. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation v. Hopkins
green
1 sentence2026Hopkins may not be deprived of that property right without ‘remedy by the due course of law’ guaranteed to him by the Delaware Constitution.”). 8 Id. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Downer v. State
green
1 sentence2023Under Delaware law, a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary guilty plea constitutes a waiver of the defendant’s right to challenge any errors occurring before the entry of the plea.2 The record reflects that Hopkins’s plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. (8) In the Truth-in-Sentencing Guilty Plea form, Hopkins indicated that he understood he was waiving certain constitutional rights, including his right to 1 Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988); Leacock v. State, 690 A.2d 926, 927-28 (Del. 1996). 2 Miller v. State, 840 A.2d 1229, 1232 (Del. 2003); Downer v. State, 543 A.2d 309 , 312–1 | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.