Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tompkins v. Stategreen2 sentences2016See Tompkins, 994 So. 2d at 1088-89 . 7 2016See Tompkins, 994 So.2d at 1088-89 . | 2 | 2 |
Jimenez v. Ratenigreen1 sentence2026See Jimenez v. Rateni, 967 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (certiorari jurisdiction existed where a challenge to the effects of an administrative order arose through an interlocutory order in a pending case involving a specific litigant facing immediate harm, not as a freestanding challenge to prospective circuit-wide policy). | 1 | 1 |
Lambrix v. Stategreen1 sentence2017See Lambrix, 39 So.3d at 266, n.10 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Holt v. CHIEF JUDGE OF THIRTEENTH JUD. CIR.
green
1 sentence2026CONFLICT is CERTIFIED with Holt v. Chief Judge of Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, 920 So. 2d 814 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), which asserted certiorari jurisdiction over a freestanding challenge by a public defender to a chief judge’s administrative order without requiring the challenge to arise from a pending proceeding involving a judicial or quasi-judicial act. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Interest of Kh
green
1 sentence1997(Emphasis supplied.) The Department also relied upon The Interest of K.H., 444 So.2d 547 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
In Interest of CMH
green
1 sentence1983Admittedly C.M.H. declared those recitals "not necessary," 413 So.2d at 428 , but they were the basis of the court's conclusion concerning the "best interest of the child." Conceding a superficial conflict between our view of statutory requirements and the court's analysis in C.M.H., the conflict is of no consequence if, as appears, C.M.H. simply poured meaning from the broad concepts of abandonment, abuse, and neglect into a broader concept, "the best interest of the child." If C.M.H. intended rather that "best interest of the child" in foster care should be a freestanding test, indeterminate | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.