Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1968–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Chemrock Corp. v. Tampa Electric Co.green1 sentence2021Co., 71 So. 3d 786, 792 (Fla. 2011) (“Our intent in amending the rule in 2005 was simply to alleviate the harshness of the rule by providing notice to a party that the action was at risk of being dismissed for lack of prosecution, and affording the party a reasonable time thereafter in which to engage in record activity in order to preclude dismissal.”). 2 In these circumstances, where the record is devoid of the required notice to the parties required by Rule 1.420(e), we can only conclude the dismissal was entered in error. | 1 | 1 |
Nietes v. American President Lines, Ltd.green1 sentence2004See Nietes, 188 F.Supp. at 221 ; Fairley, 1993 AMC at 1639; Herschaft, supra, at 593; Compagno, supra, at 389-90. | 1 | 1 |
Griffin v. Workmangreen1 sentence1985See Griffin v. Workman, 73 So.2d 844 (Fla. 1954); Lindy's of Orlando, Inc. v. United Electric Co., 239 So.2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 242 So.2d 463 (Fla. 1970); Haines v. Leonard L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lindy's of Orlando, Inc. v. United Electric Co.
green
1 sentence1985See Griffin v. Workman, 73 So.2d 844 (Fla. 1954); Lindy's of Orlando, Inc. v. United Electric Co., 239 So.2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 242 So.2d 463 (Fla. 1970); Haines v. Leonard L. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Reitz v. Atlantic National Bank
neutral
1 sentence1985See Griffin v. Workman, 73 So.2d 844 (Fla. 1954); Lindy's of Orlando, Inc. v. United Electric Co., 239 So.2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 242 So.2d 463 (Fla. 1970); Haines v. Leonard L. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State Road Department v. Tharp
green
2 sentences1981E.g., State Road Department v. Tharp, 146 Fla. 745 , 1 So.2d 868 (1941). 1981E.g., State Road Department v. Tharp, 146 Fla. 745 , 1 So.2d 868 (1941). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Dings v. Dings
green
1 sentence1968Bradford v. Bradford, Fla.App.1967, 204 So.2d 344 ; Clutter v. Clutter, Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 544 ; Dings v. Dings, Fla.App.1964, 161 So.2d 227 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Clutter v. Clutter
green
1 sentence1968Bradford v. Bradford, Fla.App.1967, 204 So.2d 344 ; Clutter v. Clutter, Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 544 ; Dings v. Dings, Fla.App.1964, 161 So.2d 227 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Bradford v. Bradford
neutral
1 sentence1968Bradford v. Bradford, Fla.App.1967, 204 So.2d 344 ; Clutter v. Clutter, Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 544 ; Dings v. Dings, Fla.App.1964, 161 So.2d 227 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.