Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1974–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Runcorn v. Shearer Lumber Products, Inc.green2 sentences2012Other courts have recognized that “[m]ueh of the harshness of the rule has been eliminated with the advent of comparative negligence in which slight contributory negligence does not act as a complete bar to recovery,” Runcorn v. Shearer Lumber Prods., Inc., 107 Idaho 389 , 690 P.2d 324, 329 (1984), and that “[m]ost of the criticism targeted at the ‘derivative liability principle’ originated prior to the advent of the comparative negligence doctrine.” Mist v. Westin Hotels, Inc., 69 Haw. 192 , 738 P.2d 85, 90 (1987) (footnote omitted). 2012Other courts have recognized that “[m]ueh of the harshness of the rule has been eliminated with the advent of comparative negligence in which slight contributory negligence does not act as a complete bar to recovery,” Runcorn v. Shearer Lumber Prods., Inc., 107 Idaho 389 , 690 P.2d 324, 329 (1984), and that “[m]ost of the criticism targeted at the ‘derivative liability principle’ originated prior to the advent of the comparative negligence doctrine.” Mist v. Westin Hotels, Inc., 69 Haw. 192 , 738 P.2d 85, 90 (1987) (footnote omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Schobinger v. Iveygreen2 sentences2012The Mist court noted that criticism by some commentators in their earlier works “has been apparently significantly retracted in their later works.” Id. at 90 n. 6; cf. Schobinger v. Ivey, 467 N.W.2d 728, 730 (N.D.1991) (reexamining imputation of negligence after adoption of comparative negligence “due to the fact that we no longer have the harsh result that would occur under the prior contributory negligence law”). 2012The Mist court noted that criticism by some commentators in their earlier works “has been apparently significantly retracted in their later works.” Id. at 90 n.6; cf. Schobinger v. Ivey , 467 N.W.2d 728, 730 (N.D. 1991) (re-examining imputation of negligence after adoption of comparative negligence “due to the fact that we no longer have the harsh result that would occur under the prior contributory negligence law”). | 2 | 2 |
Mist v. Westin Hotels, Inc.green2 sentences2012Other courts have recognized that “[m]ueh of the harshness of the rule has been eliminated with the advent of comparative negligence in which slight contributory negligence does not act as a complete bar to recovery,” Runcorn v. Shearer Lumber Prods., Inc., 107 Idaho 389 , 690 P.2d 324, 329 (1984), and that “[m]ost of the criticism targeted at the ‘derivative liability principle’ originated prior to the advent of the comparative negligence doctrine.” Mist v. Westin Hotels, Inc., 69 Haw. 192 , 738 P.2d 85, 90 (1987) (footnote omitted). 2012Other courts have recognized that “[m]ueh of the harshness of the rule has been eliminated with the advent of comparative negligence in which slight contributory negligence does not act as a complete bar to recovery,” Runcorn v. Shearer Lumber Prods., Inc., 107 Idaho 389 , 690 P.2d 324, 329 (1984), and that “[m]ost of the criticism targeted at the ‘derivative liability principle’ originated prior to the advent of the comparative negligence doctrine.” Mist v. Westin Hotels, Inc., 69 Haw. 192 , 738 P.2d 85, 90 (1987) (footnote omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Hillesland v. Federal Land Bank Ass'n of Grand Forksgreen1 sentence1994See Hillesland, supra. In Hillesland , we declined to follow those states which have recognized a bad-faith exception to the at-will doctrine. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Thompson v. St. Regis Paper Company
green
2 sentences1987Regis Paper Co., supra, 685 P.2d at 1086 -1087: “A number of courts have utilized a contract theory as a means of ameliorating the harshness of the rule. 1987Regis Paper Co., supra, 685 P.2d at 1086 -1087: "A number of courts have utilized a contract theory as a means of ameliorating the harshness of the rule. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621
green
2 sentences1974However, we do not share the view that a court-made rule, however unjust or outmoded, becomes with age invulnerable to judicial attack and cannot be discarded except by legislative action.” Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621, 264 Minn. 279 , 118 N.W.2d 795, 803 . 13 . 1974However, we do not share the view that a court-made rule, however unjust or outmoded, becomes with age invulnerable to judicial attack and cannot be discarded except by legislative action.” Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621, 264 Minn. 279 , 118 N.W.2d 795, 803 . 13 . | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.