Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1961–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cameron v. City of Miami Beachgreen1 sentence1992See Camer on v. City of Miami Beach, 152 So.2d 163 (Fla.1963). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wollard v. Lloyd's & Companies of Lloyd's
green
1 sentence2007Wollard, 439 So.2d at 218-19 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Williams v. State
yellow
1 sentence2005It is a basic tenet of statutory construction that statutes will not be interpreted so as to yield an absurd result. (emphasis added) 492 So.2d at 1053-1054 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Couch v. Hutchison
green
1 sentence1962In Couch v. Hutchison, Fla.App. 1961, 135 So.2d 18, at 21 , this court, in an opinion by Judge White, stated: "In those jurisdictions where the literal rule has been abandoned or modified it appears that the law still contemplates only that a physician shall exercise the skill and diligence of the average practitioner in the same or similar locality. * * *" In Bourgeois v. Dade County, Fla. 1956, 99 So.2d 575 , 72 A.L.R.2d 391 , our Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Mr. Justice Thornal, said: "Admittedly the science of medicine is not an exact science. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Bourgeois v. Dade County
green
1 sentence1962In Couch v. Hutchison, Fla.App. 1961, 135 So.2d 18, at 21 , this court, in an opinion by Judge White, stated: "In those jurisdictions where the literal rule has been abandoned or modified it appears that the law still contemplates only that a physician shall exercise the skill and diligence of the average practitioner in the same or similar locality. * * *" In Bourgeois v. Dade County, Fla. 1956, 99 So.2d 575 , 72 A.L.R.2d 391 , our Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Mr. Justice Thornal, said: "Admittedly the science of medicine is not an exact science. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Sinz v. Owens
green
1 sentence1961Cases from some of the jurisdictions which have abandoned or modified the locality rule are: Cavaleso v. Sharp, R.I. 1956, 121 A.2d 669 ; Morrill v. Komasinski, 1950, 256 Wis. 417 , 41 N.W.2d 620 ; McGulpin v. Bessmer, *22 Iowa 1950, 43 N.W.2d 121 , 241 Iowa 1119 ; Sinz v. Owens, Cal. 1949, 205 P.2d 3 ; see also 8 A.L.R.2d 772 ; A.L.R.2d 1960 Supp. 557. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Cavallaro v. Sharp
green
1 sentence1961Cases from some of the jurisdictions which have abandoned or modified the locality rule are: Cavaleso v. Sharp, R.I. 1956, 121 A.2d 669 ; Morrill v. Komasinski, 1950, 256 Wis. 417 , 41 N.W.2d 620 ; McGulpin v. Bessmer, *22 Iowa 1950, 43 N.W.2d 121 , 241 Iowa 1119 ; Sinz v. Owens, Cal. 1949, 205 P.2d 3 ; see also 8 A.L.R.2d 772 ; A.L.R.2d 1960 Supp. 557. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Morrill v. Komasinski
green
2 sentences1961Cases from some of the jurisdictions which have abandoned or modified the locality rule are: Cavaleso v. Sharp, R.I. 1956, 121 A.2d 669 ; Morrill v. Komasinski, 1950, 256 Wis. 417 , 41 N.W.2d 620 ; McGulpin v. Bessmer, *22 Iowa 1950, 43 N.W.2d 121 , 241 Iowa 1119 ; Sinz v. Owens, Cal. 1949, 205 P.2d 3 ; see also 8 A.L.R.2d 772 ; A.L.R.2d 1960 Supp. 557. 1961Cases from some of the jurisdictions which have abandoned or modified the locality rule are: Cavaleso v. Sharp, R.I. 1956, 121 A.2d 669 ; Morrill v. Komasinski, 1950, 256 Wis. 417 , 41 N.W.2d 620 ; McGulpin v. Bessmer, *22 Iowa 1950, 43 N.W.2d 121 , 241 Iowa 1119 ; Sinz v. Owens, Cal. 1949, 205 P.2d 3 ; see also 8 A.L.R.2d 772 ; A.L.R.2d 1960 Supp. 557. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
McGulpin v. Bessmer
green
2 sentences1961Cases from some of the jurisdictions which have abandoned or modified the locality rule are: Cavaleso v. Sharp, R.I. 1956, 121 A.2d 669 ; Morrill v. Komasinski, 1950, 256 Wis. 417 , 41 N.W.2d 620 ; McGulpin v. Bessmer, *22 Iowa 1950, 43 N.W.2d 121 , 241 Iowa 1119 ; Sinz v. Owens, Cal. 1949, 205 P.2d 3 ; see also 8 A.L.R.2d 772 ; A.L.R.2d 1960 Supp. 557. 1961Cases from some of the jurisdictions which have abandoned or modified the locality rule are: Cavaleso v. Sharp, R.I. 1956, 121 A.2d 669 ; Morrill v. Komasinski, 1950, 256 Wis. 417 , 41 N.W.2d 620 ; McGulpin v. Bessmer, *22 Iowa 1950, 43 N.W.2d 121 , 241 Iowa 1119 ; Sinz v. Owens, Cal. 1949, 205 P.2d 3 ; see also 8 A.L.R.2d 772 ; A.L.R.2d 1960 Supp. 557. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.