Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Thompson v. Reivitzgreen1 sentence2006Thompson v. Reivitz, 746 F.2d 397, 399 (7th Cir.1983), cert. den., 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S.Ct. 2332 , 85 L.Ed.2d 849 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Morrissey v. Brewer
green
2 sentences2006In Morrissey , the Court outlined the minimum due process rights to which parolees are entitled: the right to notice, limited discovery, opportunity to be present and to offer evidence, confrontation, a neutral and detached hearing body and a written statement of the reasons for the revocation. 408 U.S. at 489 , 92 S.Ct. at 2604 . 2006In Morrissey , the Court outlined the minimum due process rights to which parolees are entitled: the right to notice, limited discovery, opportunity to be present and to offer evidence, confrontation, a neutral and detached hearing body and a written statement of the reasons for the revocation. 408 U.S. at 489 , 92 S.Ct. at 2604 . | 2 | 2004–2006 |
Gagnon v. Scarpelli
red
2 sentences2004In Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972), the United States Supreme Court held that the elemental due process rights to be afforded to a person on parole in a violation hearing include "a neutral and detached hearing body." See also Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 786 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 , 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973). 2004In Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972), the United States Supreme Court held that the elemental due process rights to be afforded to a person on parole in a violation hearing include "a neutral and detached hearing body." See also Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 786 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 , 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973). | 2 | 1982–2004 |
Williams v. United States
green
1 sentence2006Thompson v. Reivitz, 746 F.2d 397, 399 (7th Cir.1983), cert. den., 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S.Ct. 2332 , 85 L.Ed.2d 849 (1985). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Thompson v. Reivitz
green
1 sentence2006Thompson v. Reivitz, 746 F.2d 397, 399 (7th Cir.1983), cert. den., 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S.Ct. 2332 , 85 L.Ed.2d 849 (1985). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Dugger v. Delta Airlines
green
1 sentence2006Thompson v. Reivitz, 746 F.2d 397, 399 (7th Cir.1983), cert. den., 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S.Ct. 2332 , 85 L.Ed.2d 849 (1985). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Myers v. Askew
neutral
1 sentence1980Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974); Myers v. Askew, 338 So.2d 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Wolff v. McDonnell
green
2 sentences1980Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974); Myers v. Askew, 338 So.2d 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). 1980Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974); Myers v. Askew, 338 So.2d 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Singletary v. State
green
1 sentence1978Upon such arrest, the parole agreement or probation order shall immediately be temporarily revoked and such person shall remain in custody until a hearing by the parole and probation commission or the court. [3] The Court in Gagnon, supra, cited the essential elements of due process necessary in a final revocation hearing: (1) written notice of claimed violation; (2) disclosure of evidence against the probationer; (3) an opportunity to be heard and present witnesses and evidence; (4) the right to confront witnesses in most instances; (5) a neutral and detached hearing body; (6) a written state | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Bernhardt v. State
green
1 sentence1978Upon such arrest, the parole agreement or probation order shall immediately be temporarily revoked and such person shall remain in custody until a hearing by the parole and probation commission or the court. [3] The Court in Gagnon, supra, cited the essential elements of due process necessary in a final revocation hearing: (1) written notice of claimed violation; (2) disclosure of evidence against the probationer; (3) an opportunity to be heard and present witnesses and evidence; (4) the right to confront witnesses in most instances; (5) a neutral and detached hearing body; (6) a written state | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State v. Spratling
green
1 sentence1978Upon such arrest, the parole agreement or probation order shall immediately be temporarily revoked and such person shall remain in custody until a hearing by the parole and probation commission or the court. [3] The Court in Gagnon, supra, cited the essential elements of due process necessary in a final revocation hearing: (1) written notice of claimed violation; (2) disclosure of evidence against the probationer; (3) an opportunity to be heard and present witnesses and evidence; (4) the right to confront witnesses in most instances; (5) a neutral and detached hearing body; (6) a written state | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Finley v. State
neutral
1 sentence1978Upon such arrest, the parole agreement or probation order shall immediately be temporarily revoked and such person shall remain in custody until a hearing by the parole and probation commission or the court. [3] The Court in Gagnon, supra, cited the essential elements of due process necessary in a final revocation hearing: (1) written notice of claimed violation; (2) disclosure of evidence against the probationer; (3) an opportunity to be heard and present witnesses and evidence; (4) the right to confront witnesses in most instances; (5) a neutral and detached hearing body; (6) a written state | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.