Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
18 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Dahlgreen2 sentences2010Dahl, 139 Wash.2d at 688 , 990 P.2d 396 (stating that, in revocation cases, "the harm in erroneously admitting hearsay evidence... is the possibility that the trial court will rely on unverified evidence in revoking a suspended sentence.") *194 ¶ 24 The record clearly indicates that the DOC provided Price with written notice of the claimed parole violations, a list of the evidence against him, an opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, a neutral and detached hearing officer, [8] and a written statement by the hearing officer referring to the evidenc 2010Dahl, 139 Wn.2d at 688 (stating that in revocation cases, “the harm in erroneously admitting hearsay evidence ... is the possibility that the trial court will rely on unverified evidence in revoking a suspended sentence”). ¶24 The record clearly indicates that the DOC provided Price with written notice of the claimed parole violations, a list of the evidence against him, an opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, a neutral and detached hearing officer, 8 and a written statement by the hearing officer referring to the evidence that she relied on to j | 3 | 9 |
Morrissey v. Brewergreen2 sentences2024Id. (citing Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S. Ct. 2593 , 33 L. 2024Id. (citing Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S. Ct. 2593 , 33 L. | 1 | 16 |
State v. Nelsongreen2 sentences2009Id. at 683, 990 P.2d 396 (citing Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972)). ¶ 18 The Supreme Court has extended some due process protections when probation is revoked for the failure to pay fines or fees. 2009Id. at 683 (citing Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S. Ct. 2593 , 33 L. | 1 | 2 |
Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. Hillgreen2 sentences2005Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 489 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 ; see also In re Personal Restraint Petition of McNeal, 99 Wash.App. 617, 619 , 994 P.2d 890 (2000) (liberty interest of a person in community custody closely resembles that of a parolee). [8] McNeal, 99 Wash.App. at 628 , 994 P.2d 890 (quoting Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 484 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 ); see also WAC 137-104-050(14) (department has obligation of proving allegations by a preponderance of the evidence). [9] Hill, 472 U.S. at 455 , 105 S.Ct. 2768 . [10] Hill, 472 U.S. at 455 , 105 S.Ct. 2768 . [11] Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 481 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 . [12] Once 2005Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 489 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 ; see also In re Personal Restraint Petition of McNeal, 99 Wash.App. 617, 619 , 994 P.2d 890 (2000) (liberty interest of a person in community custody closely resembles that of a parolee). [8] McNeal, 99 Wash.App. at 628 , 994 P.2d 890 (quoting Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 484 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 ); see also WAC 137-104-050(14) (department has obligation of proving allegations by a preponderance of the evidence). [9] Hill, 472 U.S. at 455 , 105 S.Ct. 2768 . [10] Hill, 472 U.S. at 455 , 105 S.Ct. 2768 . [11] Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 481 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 . [12] Once | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Personal Restraint of McNealgreen2 sentences2005Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 489 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 ; see also In re Personal Restraint Petition of McNeal, 99 Wash.App. 617, 619 , 994 P.2d 890 (2000) (liberty interest of a person in community custody closely resembles that of a parolee). [8] McNeal, 99 Wash.App. at 628 , 994 P.2d 890 (quoting Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 484 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 ); see also WAC 137-104-050(14) (department has obligation of proving allegations by a preponderance of the evidence). [9] Hill, 472 U.S. at 455 , 105 S.Ct. 2768 . [10] Hill, 472 U.S. at 455 , 105 S.Ct. 2768 . [11] Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 481 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 . [12] Once 2005Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 489 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 ; see also In re Personal Restraint Petition of McNeal, 99 Wash.App. 617, 619 , 994 P.2d 890 (2000) (liberty interest of a person in community custody closely resembles that of a parolee). [8] McNeal, 99 Wash.App. at 628 , 994 P.2d 890 (quoting Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 484 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 ); see also WAC 137-104-050(14) (department has obligation of proving allegations by a preponderance of the evidence). [9] Hill, 472 U.S. at 455 , 105 S.Ct. 2768 . [10] Hill, 472 U.S. at 455 , 105 S.Ct. 2768 . [11] Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 481 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 . [12] Once | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re the Personal Restraint of Lain
green
2 sentences2017In re Lain, 179 Wn.2d 1, 18 , 315 P.3d 455 (2013)(citing Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 489 ). 2017In re Lain, 179 Wn.2d 1, 18 , 315 P.3d 455 (2013)(citing Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 489 ). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. McCormick
green
1 sentence2017Dahl, 139 Wn.2d at 683 ; McCormick, 166 Wn.2d at 700 . -13- No. 74222-1-1/14 will not abandon an established rule absent a showing that the rule is "incorrect and harmful." In re Stranger Creek and Tributaries in Stevens County, 77 Wn.2d 649 , 653, 466 P.2d 508 (1970). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
In Re Stranger Creek
green
2 sentences2017Dahl, 139 Wn.2d at 683 ; McCormick, 166 Wn.2d at 700 . -13- No. 74222-1-1/14 will not abandon an established rule absent a showing that the rule is "incorrect and harmful." In re Stranger Creek and Tributaries in Stevens County, 77 Wn.2d 649 , 653, 466 P.2d 508 (1970). 2017Dahl, 139 Wn.2d at 683 ; McCormick, 166 Wn.2d at 700 . -13- No. 74222-1-1/14 will not abandon an established rule absent a showing that the rule is "incorrect and harmful." In re Stranger Creek and Tributaries in Stevens County, 77 Wn.2d 649 , 653, 466 P.2d 508 (1970). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.