probable defense (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

probable defense in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 3 courts 1921–2006 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Arad v. CADUCEUS SELF INS. FUND. INC. green
fladistctapp · 1991
1 sentence

2006NOTES [1] The information required is: (a) date, time, and place of the Incident; (b) a detailed description of what happened; (c) the name and address of the injured party; (d) the names and addresses of all witnesses; and (e) the expected nature and amount of damages. [2] "Tail coverage" is a supplemental coverage available to protect the insured in "the future for claims regarding incidents that occurred during the policy period but which were not presented until after the policy period." Arad, 585 So.2d at 1001 . [3] It appears that the trial court was unable to interpret the phrase "durin

12006–2006
United States v. Valerie Fredericks, Craig Calver, and Leon Perry green
ca5 · 1978
1 sentence

1980As in Fredericks , our holding that the defendant lacks standing to assert a probable violation of Whitley's constitutional rights does "not sanction gross police misconduct against third parties in the overly zealous pursuit of criminal convictions." 586 F.2d at 481 .

11980–1980
Devine v. Los Angeles green
· 1906
2 sentences

1956Devine v. [City of] Los Angeles, 202 U.S. 313, 334 , 26 S.Ct. 652 , 50 L.Ed. 1046 ; The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co., supra.” In Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678 , 66 S.Ct. 773 , 90 L.Ed. 939 , the plaintiff brought suit in the federal court against FBI agents for alleged illegal search and seizure and false imprisonment.

1956Devine v. [City of] Los Angeles, 202 U.S. 313, 334 , 26 S.Ct. 652 , 50 L.Ed. 1046 ; The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co., supra.” In Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678 , 66 S.Ct. 773 , 90 L.Ed. 939 , the plaintiff brought suit in the federal court against FBI agents for alleged illegal search and seizure and false imprisonment.

11956–1956
Bell v. Hood green
scotus · 1946
2 sentences

1956Devine v. [City of] Los Angeles, 202 U.S. 313, 334 , 26 S.Ct. 652 , 50 L.Ed. 1046 ; The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co., supra.” In Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678 , 66 S.Ct. 773 , 90 L.Ed. 939 , the plaintiff brought suit in the federal court against FBI agents for alleged illegal search and seizure and false imprisonment.

1956Devine v. [City of] Los Angeles, 202 U.S. 313, 334 , 26 S.Ct. 652 , 50 L.Ed. 1046 ; The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co., supra.” In Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678 , 66 S.Ct. 773 , 90 L.Ed. 939 , the plaintiff brought suit in the federal court against FBI agents for alleged illegal search and seizure and false imprisonment.

11956–1956
Conrad v. Van Buren Circuit Judge neutral
mich · 1906
2 sentences

1956Section 901.02, Florida Statutes, 1955, 3 Fla. Jur., Arrest, pp. 48-49; Conrad v. Van Buren, Cir. Judge, 144 Mich. 492 , 108 N.W. 347 .

1956Section 901.02, Florida Statutes, 1955, 3 Fla. Jur., Arrest, pp. 48-49; Conrad v. Van Buren, Cir. Judge, 144 Mich. 492 , 108 N.W. 347 .

11956–1956
Norwood v. State green
fla · 1920
2 sentences

1921There is no evidence that the “moonshine liquor” was alcoholic or intoxicating (Norwood v. State, 80 Fla. 613 , 86 South.

1921There is no evidence that the “moonshine liquor” was alcoholic or intoxicating (Norwood v. State, 80 Fla. 613 , 86 South.

11921–1921

Where else courts name it

TX 17 (1880–2026) CT 8 (1987–2024) CA 8 (1945–2015) LA 7 (1936–2022) ID 7 (1977–2018) MI 6 (1976–2024) FL 5 (1921–2006) IL 5 (1992–2026) VA 4 (1996–1996) MD 4 (1977–2023) OH 4 (1960–2020) NY 4 (1905–2010) UT 4 (2009–2020) WA 3 (1999–2021) KS 3 (1901–2025) AZ 3 (2016–2022) NJ 3 (1990–2018) PA 2 (1939–2007) SC 2 (1999–2001) VT 2 (2011–2014) NC 2 (1909–2022) MO 2 (1882–1908)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check