two-day hearing (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

two-day hearing in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 2019–2026 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Lippens v. Powersgreen
fladistctapp · 2015 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
1 sentence

2026See § 784.048(2), Fla. Stat. (defining stalking as “willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow[ing], harass[ing], or cyberstalk[ing] another person”); see also Sutton, 332 So. 3d at 1005 (“In order to be entitled to a stalking injunction two separate instances of stalking must be proven by competent substantial evidence.” (quotation omitted)). 1 We review the trial court’s findings of fact for competent substantial evidence, “[b]ut the question of whether the evidence is legally sufficient to justify imposing an injunction is a question of law reviewed de novo.” Sutton v. Fowler, 332 So. 3d

11
Sullivan v. Sullivangreen
fladistctapp · 1999 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025See Sullivan v. Sullivan, 736 So. 2d 103, 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (“A full and fair hearing does not require a trial court to allow unlimited time.

11
Bromante v. Bromantegreen
fladistctapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025However, we note that “[w]hen determining a party’s ability to pay and a party’s need for attorney’s fees and costs, the general rule is that the trial court may only consider the ‘financial resources of the parties and not the financial assistance of family or friends.’” Rogers v. Rogers, 824 So. 2d 902, 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (quoting Bromante v. Bromante, 577 So. 2d 662, 663 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)).

11
Rogers v. Rogersgreen
fladistctapp · 2002 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025However, we note that “[w]hen determining a party’s ability to pay and a party’s need for attorney’s fees and costs, the general rule is that the trial court may only consider the ‘financial resources of the parties and not the financial assistance of family or friends.’” Rogers v. Rogers, 824 So. 2d 902, 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (quoting Bromante v. Bromante, 577 So. 2d 662, 663 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)).

11
O'Shields v. United Automobile Insurancegreen
fladistctapp · 2002 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
2 sentences

2023"The court must find that there is 'bias or prejudice on the part of the guardian ad litem.' " Id. (emphasis added) (quoting O'Neill, 812 So. 2d at 450). 3 In O'Neill, like here, the trial court held a two-day hearing on a father's motion for disqualification of a GAL. 812 So. 2d at 450.

2023"The court must find that there is 'bias or prejudice on the part of the guardian ad litem.' " Id. (emphasis added) (quoting O'Neill, 812 So. 2d at 450). 3 In O'Neill, like here, the trial court held a two-day hearing on a father's motion for disqualification of a GAL. 812 So. 2d at 450.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Miller v. Alabama green
scotus · 2012
1 sentence

2019In August 2016, Nelms filed a motion for postconviction relief requesting a resentencing hearing based on Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012) (holding that the Eighth Amendment is violated when a court imposes on a juvenile homicide offender a mandatory sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole), and Atwell v. State, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016) (holding that under Florida’s existing parole system, a sentence of life with the possibility of parole after twenty-five years is indistinguishable from a life without parole sentence because Florida’s parole system does not provi

12019–2019
Angelo Atwell v. State of Florida red
fla · 2016
1 sentence

2019In August 2016, Nelms filed a motion for postconviction relief requesting a resentencing hearing based on Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012) (holding that the Eighth Amendment is violated when a court imposes on a juvenile homicide offender a mandatory sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole), and Atwell v. State, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016) (holding that under Florida’s existing parole system, a sentence of life with the possibility of parole after twenty-five years is indistinguishable from a life without parole sentence because Florida’s parole system does not provi

12019–2019

Where else courts name it

CA 14 (1979–2023) OH 14 (2007–2026) NY 10 (1987–2026) ME 10 (2003–2020) CT 7 (1996–2016) NM 5 (2009–2020) FL 5 (2019–2026) MD 4 (1960–2019) TX 4 (2006–2026) IL 3 (1977–2021) NJ 2 (1995–2021) MI 2 (1980–2026) AZ 2 (1971–2006) GA 2 (1997–2004) VA 2 (2011–2011) IN 2 (2013–2018) VT 2 (2023–2024) PA 2 (2015–2026) OR 2 (2020–2020) WI 2 (1997–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check