5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1935–2000 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Clarke v. Zantgreen1 sentence2000Accord Clarke v. Zant, supra at 196-197 , 275 S.E.2d 49 . [2] (iii) Further, the record shows that "[t]his is not a case where a defendant stood trial alone with no assistance or protection of his rights," since Brooks had the aid of defense attorney Lambert before electing to take over his own defense during trial. | 1 | 1 |
Floyd v. Swift & Co.green2 sentences1956That is exactly what happened, and I apologized fc> the lady for it.” Assuming that at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence she had made out a case with the aid of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, inasmuch as her evidence showed conclusively that she was .injured by an instrumentality in the sole control of the defendant which would not have caused the injury unless there had been some negligence, and this is true although there was no evidence introduced by the plaintiff as to how the defendant was negligent, however, “Where there is some intervention or intermediary cause which produ 1956That is exactly what happened, and I apologized fc> the lady for it.” Assuming that at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence she had made out a case with the aid of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, inasmuch as her evidence showed conclusively that she was .injured by an instrumentality in the sole control of the defendant which would not have caused the injury unless there had been some negligence, and this is true although there was no evidence introduced by the plaintiff as to how the defendant was negligent, however, “Where there is some intervention or intermediary cause which produ | 1 | 1 |
Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Shawgreen2 sentences1938See the opinion of this court in Georgia Ry. & P. Co. v. Shaw, 40 Ga. App. 341 ( 149 S. E. 657 ). 1938See the opinion of this court in Georgia Ry. & P. Co. v. Shaw, 40 Ga. App. 341 ( 149 S. E. 657 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Harper v. National Traffic Guard Company
green
2 sentences1977Harper v. National Traffic Guard Co., 73 Ga. App. 385 (2) ( 36 SE2d 842 ); Hughes v. Hartford Acc. &c. 1977Harper v. National Traffic Guard Co., 73 Ga. App. 385 (2) ( 36 SE2d 842 ); Hughes v. Hartford Acc. &c. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Rees v. City of Watertown
green
1 sentence1935In each of them it was held that equity can not supply a remedy which the legislature has not given for the collection of taxes assessed upon property, and that the legislature alone can do so.” In Rees v. Watertown, 19 Wall. 107, 121 , referred to in the Preston ease, it was said: “The plaintiff invokes the aid of the principle that, all legal remedies having failed, the court of chancery must give him a remedy; that there is a wrong which can not be righted elsewhere, and hence the right must be sustained in chancery. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.