Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1929–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Keenan v. Hillgreen2 sentences2025As we have explained, “[w]hile driving 7 without a license is a violation of State law, it does not constitute actionable negligence unless there is a causal connection between the violation and the injury.” Keenan v. Hill, 190 Ga. App. 108, 111-112 (6) ( 378 SE2d 344 ) (1989). 2025As we have explained, “[w]hile driving 7 without a license is a violation of State law, it does not constitute actionable negligence unless there is a causal connection between the violation and the injury.” Keenan v. Hill, 190 Ga. App. 108, 111-112 (6) ( 378 SE2d 344 ) (1989). | 1 | 1 |
Carpenter v. Lyonsgreen2 sentences1989Carpenter v. Lyons, 78 Ga. App. 214, 217, 218 ( 50 SE2d 850 ). 1989Carpenter v. Lyons, 78 Ga. App. 214, 217, 218 ( 50 SE2d 850 ). | 1 | 1 |
Clarke County School District v. Maddengreen2 sentences1966Clarke County School Dist. v. Madden, 99 Ga. App. 670, 673 (1) ( 110 SE2d 47 ). 1966Clarke County School Dist. v. Madden, 99 Ga. App. 670, 673 (1) ( 110 SE2d 47 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Powell v. Waters
green
2 sentences1945“In an action against a railroad company for injury to one of its employees based on the defendant’s violation of a Federal statute (the safety appliance act), in order to render the company liable, there must necessarily be, as in other cases, a causal connection between such violation and the injury.” Powell v. Waters, 55 Ga. App. 307 ( 190 S. E. 615 ). 1945“In an action against a railroad company for injury to one of its employees based on the defendant’s violation of a Federal statute (the safety appliance act), in order to render the company liable, there must necessarily be, as in other cases, a causal connection between such violation and the injury.” Powell v. Waters, 55 Ga. App. 307 ( 190 S. E. 615 ). | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Watson v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co.
green
2 sentences1929Co., 36 Ga. App. 452 ( 136 S. E. 921 ). 1929Co., 36 Ga. App. 452 ( 136 S. E. 921 ). | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.