Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 California opinions name it 2 courts 1939–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lua v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.green2 sentences2007(Lua v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1897, 1901-1902 [ 9 Cal.Rptr.2d 116 ].) For purposes of the trial court’s ruling, neither defendants’ violation of the regulation nor the causal connection between the violation and plaintiff’s fall was disputed. 2007(Lua v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1897, 1901-1902 [ 9 Cal.Rptr.2d 116 ].) For purposes of the trial court’s ruling, neither defendants’ violation of the regulation nor the causal connection between the violation and plaintiff’s fall was disputed. | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Schwartzgreen2 sentences1950(McEvoy v. American Pool Corp., 32 Cal.2d 295 [ 195 P.2d 783 ]; Smith v. Schwartz, 14 Cal.App.2d 160, 164 [ 57 P.2d 1386 ]; Dougherty v. Ellingson, 97 Cal.App. 87 [ 275 P. 456 ]; Fishman v. Silva, 116 Cal.App. 1 [ 2 P.2d 473 ]; Hill v. Peres, 136 Cal.App. 132 [ 28 P.2d 946 ]; 8 Cal.Jur. 10-Yr. 1950(McEvoy v. American Pool Corp., 32 Cal.2d 295 [ 195 P.2d 783 ]; Smith v. Schwartz, 14 Cal.App.2d 160, 164 [ 57 P.2d 1386 ]; Dougherty v. Ellingson, 97 Cal.App. 87 [ 275 P. 456 ]; Fishman v. Silva, 116 Cal.App. 1 [ 2 P.2d 473 ]; Hill v. Peres, 136 Cal.App. 132 [ 28 P.2d 946 ]; 8 Cal.Jur. 10-Yr. | 1 | 1 |
Baillargeon v. Myersgreen2 sentences1939(Baillargeon v. Myers, 180 Cal. 504, 507 [ 182 Pac. 37 ]; Anderson v. I. 1939(Baillargeon v. Myers, 180 Cal. 504, 507 [ 182 Pac. 37 ]; Anderson v. I. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Shimoda v. Bundy
green
2 sentences1970(Page v. Mayors, 191 Cal. 263 [ 216 P. 31 ]; Shimoda v. Bundy, 24 Cal.App. 675 [ 142 P. 109 ]; Roos v. Loeser, 41 Cal. App. 782 [ 183 P. 204 ]; Blodgett v. B. 1970(Page v. Mayors, 191 Cal. 263 [ 216 P. 31 ]; Shimoda v. Bundy, 24 Cal.App. 675 [ 142 P. 109 ]; Roos v. Loeser, 41 Cal. App. 782 [ 183 P. 204 ]; Blodgett v. B. | 2 | 1954–1970 |
Roos v. Loeser
green
2 sentences1970(Page v. Mayors, 191 Cal. 263 [ 216 P. 31 ]; Shimoda v. Bundy, 24 Cal.App. 675 [ 142 P. 109 ]; Roos v. Loeser, 41 Cal. App. 782 [ 183 P. 204 ]; Blodgett v. B. 1970(Page v. Mayors, 191 Cal. 263 [ 216 P. 31 ]; Shimoda v. Bundy, 24 Cal.App. 675 [ 142 P. 109 ]; Roos v. Loeser, 41 Cal. App. 782 [ 183 P. 204 ]; Blodgett v. B. | 2 | 1954–1970 |
Page v. Mayors
green
2 sentences1970(Page v. Mayors, 191 Cal. 263 [ 216 P. 31 ]; Shimoda v. Bundy, 24 Cal.App. 675 [ 142 P. 109 ]; Roos v. Loeser, 41 Cal. App. 782 [ 183 P. 204 ]; Blodgett v. B. 1970(Page v. Mayors, 191 Cal. 263 [ 216 P. 31 ]; Shimoda v. Bundy, 24 Cal.App. 675 [ 142 P. 109 ]; Roos v. Loeser, 41 Cal. App. 782 [ 183 P. 204 ]; Blodgett v. B. | 2 | 1954–1970 |
Romero v. Volunteer State Life Insurance
green
1 sentence1980Co. (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 571 [ 88 Cal.Rptr. 820 ], which defendant cites as the only California case discussing the issue of whether there need be a causal connection between the violation of law and injury, involved an accidental death life insurance policy which excluded coverage for “‘injuries contracted or sustained by the Insured while committing or attempting to commit an assault or felony.’” (Id., at p. 574.) Defendant appears to think it significant that the parties agreed “that the felonious acts must be the proximate cause of injury to another.” (Id., at p. 579, italics omitted.) Eve | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Corsetto v. Pacific Electric Railway
green
2 sentences1959Inasmuch as the issue of the competency of the motorman was raised in the case by defendants and evidence on it introduced without objection, we deem it unnecessary to discuss cases like Corsetto v. Pacific Electric Ry., 136 Cal.App.2d 631 [ 289 P.2d 116 ], and Langford v. San Diego Elec. 1959Inasmuch as the issue of the competency of the motorman was raised in the case by defendants and evidence on it introduced without objection, we deem it unnecessary to discuss cases like Corsetto v. Pacific Electric Ry., 136 Cal.App.2d 631 [ 289 P.2d 116 ], and Langford v. San Diego Elec. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
McEvoy v. American Pool Corp.
green
2 sentences1950(McEvoy v. American Pool Corp., 32 Cal.2d 295 [ 195 P.2d 783 ]; Smith v. Schwartz, 14 Cal.App.2d 160, 164 [ 57 P.2d 1386 ]; Dougherty v. Ellingson, 97 Cal.App. 87 [ 275 P. 456 ]; Fishman v. Silva, 116 Cal.App. 1 [ 2 P.2d 473 ]; Hill v. Peres, 136 Cal.App. 132 [ 28 P.2d 946 ]; 8 Cal.Jur. 10-Yr. 1950(McEvoy v. American Pool Corp., 32 Cal.2d 295 [ 195 P.2d 783 ]; Smith v. Schwartz, 14 Cal.App.2d 160, 164 [ 57 P.2d 1386 ]; Dougherty v. Ellingson, 97 Cal.App. 87 [ 275 P. 456 ]; Fishman v. Silva, 116 Cal.App. 1 [ 2 P.2d 473 ]; Hill v. Peres, 136 Cal.App. 132 [ 28 P.2d 946 ]; 8 Cal.Jur. 10-Yr. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Hill v. Peres
green
2 sentences1950(McEvoy v. American Pool Corp., 32 Cal.2d 295 [ 195 P.2d 783 ]; Smith v. Schwartz, 14 Cal.App.2d 160, 164 [ 57 P.2d 1386 ]; Dougherty v. Ellingson, 97 Cal.App. 87 [ 275 P. 456 ]; Fishman v. Silva, 116 Cal.App. 1 [ 2 P.2d 473 ]; Hill v. Peres, 136 Cal.App. 132 [ 28 P.2d 946 ]; 8 Cal.Jur. 10-Yr. 1950(McEvoy v. American Pool Corp., 32 Cal.2d 295 [ 195 P.2d 783 ]; Smith v. Schwartz, 14 Cal.App.2d 160, 164 [ 57 P.2d 1386 ]; Dougherty v. Ellingson, 97 Cal.App. 87 [ 275 P. 456 ]; Fishman v. Silva, 116 Cal.App. 1 [ 2 P.2d 473 ]; Hill v. Peres, 136 Cal.App. 132 [ 28 P.2d 946 ]; 8 Cal.Jur. 10-Yr. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Dougherty v. Ellingson
green
2 sentences1950(McEvoy v. American Pool Corp., 32 Cal.2d 295 [ 195 P.2d 783 ]; Smith v. Schwartz, 14 Cal.App.2d 160, 164 [ 57 P.2d 1386 ]; Dougherty v. Ellingson, 97 Cal.App. 87 [ 275 P. 456 ]; Fishman v. Silva, 116 Cal.App. 1 [ 2 P.2d 473 ]; Hill v. Peres, 136 Cal.App. 132 [ 28 P.2d 946 ]; 8 Cal.Jur. 10-Yr. 1950(McEvoy v. American Pool Corp., 32 Cal.2d 295 [ 195 P.2d 783 ]; Smith v. Schwartz, 14 Cal.App.2d 160, 164 [ 57 P.2d 1386 ]; Dougherty v. Ellingson, 97 Cal.App. 87 [ 275 P. 456 ]; Fishman v. Silva, 116 Cal.App. 1 [ 2 P.2d 473 ]; Hill v. Peres, 136 Cal.App. 132 [ 28 P.2d 946 ]; 8 Cal.Jur. 10-Yr. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Fishman v. Silva
green
2 sentences1950(McEvoy v. American Pool Corp., 32 Cal.2d 295 [ 195 P.2d 783 ]; Smith v. Schwartz, 14 Cal.App.2d 160, 164 [ 57 P.2d 1386 ]; Dougherty v. Ellingson, 97 Cal.App. 87 [ 275 P. 456 ]; Fishman v. Silva, 116 Cal.App. 1 [ 2 P.2d 473 ]; Hill v. Peres, 136 Cal.App. 132 [ 28 P.2d 946 ]; 8 Cal.Jur. 10-Yr. 1950(McEvoy v. American Pool Corp., 32 Cal.2d 295 [ 195 P.2d 783 ]; Smith v. Schwartz, 14 Cal.App.2d 160, 164 [ 57 P.2d 1386 ]; Dougherty v. Ellingson, 97 Cal.App. 87 [ 275 P. 456 ]; Fishman v. Silva, 116 Cal.App. 1 [ 2 P.2d 473 ]; Hill v. Peres, 136 Cal.App. 132 [ 28 P.2d 946 ]; 8 Cal.Jur. 10-Yr. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.