Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1957–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ford v. Stategreen2 sentences1990Ford v. State, 232 Ga. 511, 517 (12) ( 207 SE2d 494 ) (1944). 1990Ford v. State, 232 Ga. 511, 517 (12) ( 207 SE2d 494 ) (1944). | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Faretta v. California
green
2 sentences2018In this regard, Foster stated his pants were bloody because he had been outside with his dog and the dog had scratched his legs. 5 pursuant to Faretta v. California, 422 U. S. 806 ( 95 SCt 2525 , 45 LE2d 562) (1975), did not object to Ball’s statements being admitted at trial. 2018In this regard, Foster stated his pants were bloody because he had been outside with his dog and the dog had scratched his legs. 5 pursuant to Faretta v. California, 422 U. S. 806 ( 95 SCt 2525 , 45 LE2d 562) (1975), did not object to Ball’s statements being admitted at trial. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Waller v. State
green
2 sentences1957It is our opinion that the court’s charge gave the defendant the benefit of justification in a positive manner, not as a negative defense as contended by counsel for the defendant; therefore, Fountain v. State, 207 Ga. 144 ( 60 S. E. 2d 433 ), and Waller v. State, 102 Ga. 684 ( 28 S. E. 284 ) do not apply under the full charge of the court in the instant case. 1957It is our opinion that the court’s charge gave the defendant the benefit of justification in a positive manner, not as a negative defense as contended by counsel for the defendant; therefore, Fountain v. State, 207 Ga. 144 ( 60 S. E. 2d 433 ), and Waller v. State, 102 Ga. 684 ( 28 S. E. 284 ) do not apply under the full charge of the court in the instant case. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Fountain v. State
green
2 sentences1957It is our opinion that the court’s charge gave the defendant the benefit of justification in a positive manner, not as a negative defense as contended by counsel for the defendant; therefore, Fountain v. State, 207 Ga. 144 ( 60 S. E. 2d 433 ), and Waller v. State, 102 Ga. 684 ( 28 S. E. 284 ) do not apply under the full charge of the court in the instant case. 1957It is our opinion that the court’s charge gave the defendant the benefit of justification in a positive manner, not as a negative defense as contended by counsel for the defendant; therefore, Fountain v. State, 207 Ga. 144 ( 60 S. E. 2d 433 ), and Waller v. State, 102 Ga. 684 ( 28 S. E. 284 ) do not apply under the full charge of the court in the instant case. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.