5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2017–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gish v. Castner-Williams & Askland Drainage Districtgreen2 sentences2017See Gish v. Castner-Williams & Askland Drainage Dist., 136 Iowa 155, 157 , 113 N.W. 757, 757 (1907) (“The drainage district is not such [a] legal entity as is known to or recognized by law as a proper party to adversary proceedings.”); Clary v. Woodbury County, 135 Iowa 488, 495 , 113 N.W. 330 , 332–33 (1907) (holding drainage district could not be sued for downstream flooding). 2017See Gish v. Castner-Williams & Askland Drainage Dist., 136 Iowa 155, 157 , 113 N.W. 757, 757 (1907) (“The drainage district is not such [a] legal entity as is known to or recognized by law as a proper party to adversary proceedings.”); Clary v. Woodbury County, 135 Iowa 488, 495 , 113 N.W. 330 , 332–33 (1907) (holding drainage district could not be sued for downstream flooding). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Jacksongreen1 sentence2020Iowa Code § 356.7 (1) (emphasis added). “[T]he language ‘who has been convicted of a criminal offense’ describes who may be charged rather than the services for which charges may be made.” State v. Jackson, 601 N.W.2d 354, 356 (Iowa 1999) (quoting Iowa Code § 356.7 (1)). | 1 | 1 |
Konicek v. Loomis Bros., Inc.green1 sentence2020See Konicek v. Lommis Bros., Inc., 457 N.W.2d 614, 617 (Iowa 1990) (“A judgment notwithstanding verdict must stand or fall on the grounds stated in the motion for directed verdict. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Clary v. Woodbury County
green
2 sentences2017See Gish v. Castner-Williams & Askland Drainage Dist., 136 Iowa 155, 157 , 113 N.W. 757, 757 (1907) (“The drainage district is not such [a] legal entity as is known to or recognized by law as a proper party to adversary proceedings.”); Clary v. Woodbury County, 135 Iowa 488, 495 , 113 N.W. 330 , 332–33 (1907) (holding drainage district could not be sued for downstream flooding). 2017See Gish v. Castner-Williams & Askland Drainage Dist., 136 Iowa 155, 157 , 113 N.W. 757, 757 (1907) (“The drainage district is not such [a] legal entity as is known to or recognized by law as a proper party to adversary proceedings.”); Clary v. Woodbury County, 135 Iowa 488, 495 , 113 N.W. 330 , 332–33 (1907) (holding drainage district could not be sued for downstream flooding). | 3 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Abrahamson
green
2 sentences2020“If the sheriff wishes to have the claim included in a restitution plan, the sheriff must make a specific request to that effect in the reimbursement claim.” Abrahamson, 696 N.W.2d at 591 ; see also Iowa Code § 356.7 (2)(i). 2020If the sheriff does not ask for the court to include correctional fees in the restitution award, the sheriff may collect the amount “as a judgment in the traditional sense, under Iowa Code chapter 626.” Abrahamson, 696 N.W.2d at 591 ; see also State v. Gross, ___ N.W.2d at ___, 2019 WL 6040803 , at *8; State v. Quijas, No. 17-1043, 2018 WL 3654845 , at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. Aug. 1, 2018). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.