Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In the Interest of A.M.H.green2 sentences2026See generally In re A.M.H., 516 N.W.2d 867, 871 (Iowa 1994) (observing we “cannot go back in time” and review “alleged errors” in orders after the time to appeal those orders has passed). 6 2015See In re A.M.H., 516 N.W.2d 867, 871 (Iowa 1994) (“Custody of the child was placed with DHS under the dispositional order. | 2 | 2 |
In the Interest of C.F.-h., Minor Child, C.H., Fathergreen2 sentences2022See In re C.F.-H., 889 N.W.2d 201 , 206–07 (Iowa 2016); In re H.B.-H, No. 21-1153, 2021 WL 5467301 , at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Nov. 23, 2021). 2020The removal requirement does not require removal from both parents; it is satisfied when the child is removed from either parent.1 See, e.g., In re N.M., 491 N.W.2d 153 , 155– 1 Moreover, we note this case differs from C.F.-H. 889 N.W.2d at 208 . | 1 | 2 |
In the Matter of B.B., Alleged to Be Seriously Mentally Impaired, B.B.green1 sentence2021“Ordinarily, an appeal is moot if the ‘issue becomes nonexistent or academic and, consequently, no longer involves a justiciable controversy.’” In re B.B., 826 N.W.2d 425, 428 (Iowa 2013) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In the Interest of N.M.
green
1 sentence2020The removal requirement does not require removal from both parents; it is satisfied when the child is removed from either parent.1 See, e.g., In re N.M., 491 N.W.2d 153 , 155– 1 Moreover, we note this case differs from C.F.-H. 889 N.W.2d at 208 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.