5 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1921–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lopezgreen2 sentences2014State v. Lopez, 100 Idaho 99, 102 , 593 P.2d 1003, 1006 (1979) (“The failure of the trial court to instruct on assault with a deadly weapon was caused by defendant’s objection and therefore was invited error and will not be considered on appeal.”); State v. Johnston, 61 14 Idaho 87, 90 , 98 P.2d 628, 629 (1940) (“The record discloses this instruction was given upon the request of the appellant [defendant]. 2014State v. Lopez, 100 Idaho 99, 102 , 593 P.2d 1003, 1006 (1979) (“The failure of the trial court to instruct on assault with a deadly weapon was caused by defendant’s objection and therefore was invited error and will not be considered on appeal.”); State v. Johnston, 61 14 Idaho 87, 90 , 98 P.2d 628, 629 (1940) (“The record discloses this instruction was given upon the request of the appellant [defendant]. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Johnstongreen2 sentences2014State v. Lopez, 100 Idaho 99, 102 , 593 P.2d 1003, 1006 (1979) (“The failure of the trial court to instruct on assault with a deadly weapon was caused by defendant’s objection and therefore was invited error and will not be considered on appeal.”); State v. Johnston, 61 14 Idaho 87, 90 , 98 P.2d 628, 629 (1940) (“The record discloses this instruction was given upon the request of the appellant [defendant]. 2014State v. Lopez, 100 Idaho 99, 102 , 593 P.2d 1003, 1006 (1979) (“The failure of the trial court to instruct on assault with a deadly weapon was caused by defendant’s objection and therefore was invited error and will not be considered on appeal.”); State v. Johnston, 61 Idaho 87, 90 , 98 P.2d 628, 629 (1940) (“The record discloses this instruction was given upon the request of the appellant [defendant]. | 2 | 2 |
Idaho Underground Water Users Ass'n v. Idaho Power Co.green2 sentences1981Certainly we do not minimize the problems created by the ‘economic squeeze’ of increased costs with lowering prices, as testified to by members of appellant; but the record discloses these factors were fully considered by the Commission, and thus are not reviewable by this court, except to determine whether there was evidence to sustain the determination made [citation omitted].” Idaho Underground Water Users Association v. Idaho Power Co., 89 Idaho 147, 167-68 , 404 P.2d 859, 871 (1965). 1981Certainly we do not minimize the problems created by the ‘economic squeeze’ of increased costs with lowering prices, as testified to by members of appellant; but the record discloses these factors were fully considered by the Commission, and thus are not reviewable by this court, except to determine whether there was evidence to sustain the determination made [citation omitted].” Idaho Underground Water Users Association v. Idaho Power Co., 89 Idaho 147, 167-68 , 404 P.2d 859, 871 (1965). | 1 | 2 |
Union Stock Yards National Bank v. Bolangreen1 sentence2014State v. Lopez, 100 Idaho 99, 102 , 593 P.2d 1003, 1006 (1979) (“The failure of the trial court to instruct on assault with a deadly weapon was caused by defendant’s objection and therefore was invited error and will not be considered on appeal.”); State v. Johnston, 61 14 Idaho 87, 90 , 98 P.2d 628, 629 (1940) (“The record discloses this instruction was given upon the request of the appellant [defendant]. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Evans State Bank v. Skeen
green
2 sentences1921(State v. Grady, 31 Ida. 272 , 170 Pac. 85 ; Rhodenbaugh v, Stingel, 31 Ida. 594 , 174 Pac. 604 ; Evans State Bank v. Skeen, 30 Ida. 703 , 167 Pac. 1165 .) The record discloses no error, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. ' Rice, C. 1921(State v. Grady, 31 Ida. 272 , 170 Pac. 85 ; Rhodenbaugh v, Stingel, 31 Ida. 594 , 174 Pac. 604 ; Evans State Bank v. Skeen, 30 Ida. 703 , 167 Pac. 1165 .) The record discloses no error, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. ' Rice, C. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
State v. Grady
green
2 sentences1921(State v. Grady, 31 Ida. 272 , 170 Pac. 85 ; Rhodenbaugh v, Stingel, 31 Ida. 594 , 174 Pac. 604 ; Evans State Bank v. Skeen, 30 Ida. 703 , 167 Pac. 1165 .) The record discloses no error, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. ' Rice, C. 1921(State v. Grady, 31 Ida. 272 , 170 Pac. 85 ; Rhodenbaugh v, Stingel, 31 Ida. 594 , 174 Pac. 604 ; Evans State Bank v. Skeen, 30 Ida. 703 , 167 Pac. 1165 .) The record discloses no error, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. ' Rice, C. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Rhodenbaugh v. Stingel
neutral
2 sentences1921(State v. Grady, 31 Ida. 272 , 170 Pac. 85 ; Rhodenbaugh v, Stingel, 31 Ida. 594 , 174 Pac. 604 ; Evans State Bank v. Skeen, 30 Ida. 703 , 167 Pac. 1165 .) The record discloses no error, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. ' Rice, C. 1921(State v. Grady, 31 Ida. 272 , 170 Pac. 85 ; Rhodenbaugh v, Stingel, 31 Ida. 594 , 174 Pac. 604 ; Evans State Bank v. Skeen, 30 Ida. 703 , 167 Pac. 1165 .) The record discloses no error, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. ' Rice, C. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.