record discloses error (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

record discloses error in North Carolina

8 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1905–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Tise v. Town of Thomasvillegreen
nc · 1909 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020Jefferson v. City of Raleigh, 194 N.C. 479, 482 , 140 S.E. 76, 77 (1927); see generally Tise, 151 N.C. 281 , 65 S.E. 1007 .

2020Jefferson v. City of Raleigh, 194 N.C. 479, 482 , 140 S.E. 76, 77 (1927); see generally Tise, 151 N.C. 281 , 65 S.E. 1007 .

22
Jefferson v. City of Raleighgreen
nc · 1927 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020Jefferson v. City of Raleigh, 194 N.C. 479, 482 , 140 S.E. 76, 77 (1927); see generally Tise, 151 N.C. 281 , 65 S.E. 1007 .

2020Jefferson v. City of Raleigh, 194 N.C. 479, 482 , 140 S.E. 76, 77 (1927); see generally Tise, 151 N.C. 281 , 65 S.E. 1007 .

22
Pointer v. United Statesgreen
· 1894 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976
2 sentences

1976In Pointer v. United States, 151 U.S. 396, 408-09 , 38 L.Ed. 208, 214 , 14 S.Ct. 410, 414-15 (1894), the Court stated: “The right to challenge a given number of jurors without showing cause is one of the most important of the rights secured to the accused. ...

1976In Pointer v. United States, 151 U.S. 396, 408-09 , 38 L.Ed. 208, 214 , 14 S.Ct. 410, 414-15 (1894), the Court stated: “The right to challenge a given number of jurors without showing cause is one of the most important of the rights secured to the accused. ...

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

CaseCitedYears
Lewis v. United States green
scotus · 1892
2 sentences

1976Thus reading the record, and holding as we do that making of challenges was an essential part of the trial, and that it was one of the substantial rights of 'the prisoner to be brought face to face with the jurors at the time when the challenges were made, we are brought to the conclusion that the record discloses an error. ...” 146 U.S. at 376 , 36 L.Ed. at 1014 , 13 S.Ct. at 138 .

1976Thus reading the record, and holding as we do that making of challenges was an essential part of the trial, and that it was one of the substantial rights of 'the prisoner to be brought face to face with the jurors at the time when the challenges were made, we are brought to the conclusion that the record discloses an error. ...” 146 U.S. at 376 , 36 L.Ed. at 1014 , 13 S.Ct. at 138 .

11976–1976
State v. Stegmann green
nc · 1975
2 sentences

1975State v. Robbins, 287 N.C. 483 , 214 S.E. 2d 756 ; State v. Stegmann, 286 N.C. 638 , 213 S.E. 2d 262 ; State v. Honeycutt, 285 N.C. 174 , 203 S.E. 2d 844 ; State v. Dillard, 285 N.C. 72 , 203 S.E. 2d 6 ; State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1 , 203 S.E. 2d 10 ; State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625 , 202 S.E. 2d 721 ; State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431 , 194 S.E. 2d 19 . *35 Our careful search of this entire record discloses no error warranting a new trial.

1975State v. Robbins, 287 N.C. 483 , 214 S.E. 2d 756 ; State v. Stegmann, 286 N.C. 638 , 213 S.E. 2d 262 ; State v. Honeycutt, 285 N.C. 174 , 203 S.E. 2d 844 ; State v. Dillard, 285 N.C. 72 , 203 S.E. 2d 6 ; State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1 , 203 S.E. 2d 10 ; State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625 , 202 S.E. 2d 721 ; State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431 , 194 S.E. 2d 19 . *35 Our careful search of this entire record discloses no error warranting a new trial.

11975–1975
State v. Jarrette green
nc · 1974
2 sentences

1975State v. Robbins, 287 N.C. 483 , 214 S.E. 2d 756 ; State v. Stegmann, 286 N.C. 638 , 213 S.E. 2d 262 ; State v. Honeycutt, 285 N.C. 174 , 203 S.E. 2d 844 ; State v. Dillard, 285 N.C. 72 , 203 S.E. 2d 6 ; State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1 , 203 S.E. 2d 10 ; State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625 , 202 S.E. 2d 721 ; State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431 , 194 S.E. 2d 19 . *35 Our careful search of this entire record discloses no error warranting a new trial.

1975State v. Robbins, 287 N.C. 483 , 214 S.E. 2d 756 ; State v. Stegmann, 286 N.C. 638 , 213 S.E. 2d 262 ; State v. Honeycutt, 285 N.C. 174 , 203 S.E. 2d 844 ; State v. Dillard, 285 N.C. 72 , 203 S.E. 2d 6 ; State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1 , 203 S.E. 2d 10 ; State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625 , 202 S.E. 2d 721 ; State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431 , 194 S.E. 2d 19 . *35 Our careful search of this entire record discloses no error warranting a new trial.

11975–1975
State v. Robbins green
nc · 1975
2 sentences

1975State v. Robbins, 287 N.C. 483 , 214 S.E. 2d 756 ; State v. Stegmann, 286 N.C. 638 , 213 S.E. 2d 262 ; State v. Honeycutt, 285 N.C. 174 , 203 S.E. 2d 844 ; State v. Dillard, 285 N.C. 72 , 203 S.E. 2d 6 ; State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1 , 203 S.E. 2d 10 ; State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625 , 202 S.E. 2d 721 ; State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431 , 194 S.E. 2d 19 . *35 Our careful search of this entire record discloses no error warranting a new trial.

1975State v. Robbins, 287 N.C. 483 , 214 S.E. 2d 756 ; State v. Stegmann, 286 N.C. 638 , 213 S.E. 2d 262 ; State v. Honeycutt, 285 N.C. 174 , 203 S.E. 2d 844 ; State v. Dillard, 285 N.C. 72 , 203 S.E. 2d 6 ; State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1 , 203 S.E. 2d 10 ; State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625 , 202 S.E. 2d 721 ; State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431 , 194 S.E. 2d 19 . *35 Our careful search of this entire record discloses no error warranting a new trial.

11975–1975
State v. Dillard green
nc · 1974
2 sentences

1975State v. Robbins, 287 N.C. 483 , 214 S.E. 2d 756 ; State v. Stegmann, 286 N.C. 638 , 213 S.E. 2d 262 ; State v. Honeycutt, 285 N.C. 174 , 203 S.E. 2d 844 ; State v. Dillard, 285 N.C. 72 , 203 S.E. 2d 6 ; State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1 , 203 S.E. 2d 10 ; State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625 , 202 S.E. 2d 721 ; State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431 , 194 S.E. 2d 19 . *35 Our careful search of this entire record discloses no error warranting a new trial.

1975State v. Robbins, 287 N.C. 483 , 214 S.E. 2d 756 ; State v. Stegmann, 286 N.C. 638 , 213 S.E. 2d 262 ; State v. Honeycutt, 285 N.C. 174 , 203 S.E. 2d 844 ; State v. Dillard, 285 N.C. 72 , 203 S.E. 2d 6 ; State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1 , 203 S.E. 2d 10 ; State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625 , 202 S.E. 2d 721 ; State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431 , 194 S.E. 2d 19 . *35 Our careful search of this entire record discloses no error warranting a new trial.

11975–1975
State v. Honeycutt green
nc · 1974
2 sentences

1975State v. Robbins, 287 N.C. 483 , 214 S.E. 2d 756 ; State v. Stegmann, 286 N.C. 638 , 213 S.E. 2d 262 ; State v. Honeycutt, 285 N.C. 174 , 203 S.E. 2d 844 ; State v. Dillard, 285 N.C. 72 , 203 S.E. 2d 6 ; State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1 , 203 S.E. 2d 10 ; State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625 , 202 S.E. 2d 721 ; State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431 , 194 S.E. 2d 19 . *35 Our careful search of this entire record discloses no error warranting a new trial.

1975State v. Robbins, 287 N.C. 483 , 214 S.E. 2d 756 ; State v. Stegmann, 286 N.C. 638 , 213 S.E. 2d 262 ; State v. Honeycutt, 285 N.C. 174 , 203 S.E. 2d 844 ; State v. Dillard, 285 N.C. 72 , 203 S.E. 2d 6 ; State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1 , 203 S.E. 2d 10 ; State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625 , 202 S.E. 2d 721 ; State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431 , 194 S.E. 2d 19 . *35 Our careful search of this entire record discloses no error warranting a new trial.

11975–1975
State v. Henderson green
nc · 1974
2 sentences

1975State v. Robbins, 287 N.C. 483 , 214 S.E. 2d 756 ; State v. Stegmann, 286 N.C. 638 , 213 S.E. 2d 262 ; State v. Honeycutt, 285 N.C. 174 , 203 S.E. 2d 844 ; State v. Dillard, 285 N.C. 72 , 203 S.E. 2d 6 ; State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1 , 203 S.E. 2d 10 ; State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625 , 202 S.E. 2d 721 ; State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431 , 194 S.E. 2d 19 . *35 Our careful search of this entire record discloses no error warranting a new trial.

1975State v. Robbins, 287 N.C. 483 , 214 S.E. 2d 756 ; State v. Stegmann, 286 N.C. 638 , 213 S.E. 2d 262 ; State v. Honeycutt, 285 N.C. 174 , 203 S.E. 2d 844 ; State v. Dillard, 285 N.C. 72 , 203 S.E. 2d 6 ; State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1 , 203 S.E. 2d 10 ; State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625 , 202 S.E. 2d 721 ; State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431 , 194 S.E. 2d 19 . *35 Our careful search of this entire record discloses no error warranting a new trial.

11975–1975
State v. Waddell green
nc · 1973
2 sentences

1975State v. Robbins, 287 N.C. 483 , 214 S.E. 2d 756 ; State v. Stegmann, 286 N.C. 638 , 213 S.E. 2d 262 ; State v. Honeycutt, 285 N.C. 174 , 203 S.E. 2d 844 ; State v. Dillard, 285 N.C. 72 , 203 S.E. 2d 6 ; State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1 , 203 S.E. 2d 10 ; State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625 , 202 S.E. 2d 721 ; State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431 , 194 S.E. 2d 19 . *35 Our careful search of this entire record discloses no error warranting a new trial.

1975State v. Robbins, 287 N.C. 483 , 214 S.E. 2d 756 ; State v. Stegmann, 286 N.C. 638 , 213 S.E. 2d 262 ; State v. Honeycutt, 285 N.C. 174 , 203 S.E. 2d 844 ; State v. Dillard, 285 N.C. 72 , 203 S.E. 2d 6 ; State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1 , 203 S.E. 2d 10 ; State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625 , 202 S.E. 2d 721 ; State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431 , 194 S.E. 2d 19 . *35 Our careful search of this entire record discloses no error warranting a new trial.

11975–1975
State v. Best neutral
ncctapp · 1971
1 sentence

1972State v. Best, 11 N.C.

11972–1972
Witherspoon v. Illinois green
scotus · 1968
2 sentences

1969Prior to the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 , 88 S.Ct. 1770 , 20 L.Ed.2d 776 , it was well established that, under the law of this State, it was not error to allow challenges for cause by the State to prospective jurors who stated they had "conscientious scruples against the infliction of the death penalty" in a case where such penalty might be inflicted pursuant to a verdict of guilty.

1969Prior to the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 , 88 S.Ct. 1770 , 20 L.Ed.2d 776 , it was well established that, under the law of this State, it was not error to allow challenges for cause by the State to prospective jurors who stated they had "conscientious scruples against the infliction of the death penalty" in a case where such penalty might be inflicted pursuant to a verdict of guilty.

11969–1969
Jones v. Jones neutral
nc · 1952
2 sentences

1960Jones v. Jones, 235 N.C. 390, 391 , 70 S.E.2d 13 .

1960Jones v. Jones, 235 N.C. 390, 391 , 70 S.E.2d 13 .

11960–1960
State v. . Jones neutral
nc · 1888
1 sentence

1905State v. Jones, supra. The record discloses no error committed in the trial below.

11905–1905

Where else courts name it

NY 36 (1898–2021) CA 36 (1921–2022) TX 29 (1886–2011) IL 25 (1892–2015) WA 16 (1949–2017) KS 13 (1904–1980) MA 10 (1925–1994) MI 10 (1936–2018) AL 10 (1914–2003) MD 9 (1967–2012) FL 8 (1959–1992) NC 8 (1905–2020) ME 7 (1957–2011) PA 7 (1915–1986) OH 6 (1923–2021) CT 5 (1988–2019) IN 5 (1915–1982) ID 5 (1921–2014) GA 5 (1911–1985) OK 5 (1908–1942) MO 4 (1905–1978) NE 3 (1895–1950) RI 3 (1981–2013) MN 3 (1910–1975) LA 3 (1929–2008) OR 3 (1924–2025) VT 2 (1940–1951) AZ 2 (1966–1966) VA 2 (1973–1996) ND 2 (1898–1990) MT 2 (1910–1922)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check