Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Connecticut opinions name it 1 courts 1988–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hill
green
2 sentences2019The record discloses that defense counsel also argued that the state had "to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that [the defendant] knew, or had knowledge of, that he was in possession of this weapon, that he knew where it was and that he had access to it." We note that neither argument mirrors State v. Hill , supra, 201 Conn. at 516 , 523 A.2d 1252 ("control is not the manifestation of an act of control but instead it is the act of being in a position of control coupled with the requisite mental intent"). 2019The record discloses that defense counsel also argued that the state had "to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that [the defendant] knew, or had knowledge of, that he was in possession of this weapon, that he knew where it was and that he had access to it." We note that neither argument mirrors State v. Hill , supra, 201 Conn. at 516 , 523 A.2d 1252 ("control is not the manifestation of an act of control but instead it is the act of being in a position of control coupled with the requisite mental intent"). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Golding
green
2 sentences1999The defendant also claims that this issue was distinctly raised at trial, but, in the event that it was not properly preserved, he seeks review under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989). 1 Our review of the record discloses that this claim was not properly preserved at trial. 1999The defendant also claims that this issue was distinctly raised at trial, but, in the event that it was not properly preserved, he seeks review under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989). 1 Our review of the record discloses that this claim was not properly preserved at trial. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Murrell
green
2 sentences1990State v. Murrell, 7 Conn. App. 75, 91 , 507 A.2d 1033 (1986), and cases cited therein. 1990State v. Murrell, 7 Conn. App. 75, 91 , 507 A.2d 1033 (1986), and cases cited therein. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Taylor
green
2 sentences1990State v. Taylor, 23 Conn. App. 426 , 430 n.l, 580 A.2d 1004 (1990), and cases cited therein. 1990State v. Taylor, 23 Conn. App. 426 , 430 n.l, 580 A.2d 1004 (1990), and cases cited therein. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Thurman
green
2 sentences1988State v. Huff, 10 Conn. App. 330, 334 , 523 A.2d 906 (1987); State v. Thurman, 10 Conn. App. 302, 306 , 523 A.2d 891 (1987). 1988State v. Huff, 10 Conn. App. 330, 334 , 523 A.2d 906 (1987); State v. Thurman, 10 Conn. App. 302, 306 , 523 A.2d 891 (1987). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
State v. Huff
green
2 sentences1988State v. Huff, 10 Conn. App. 330, 334 , 523 A.2d 906 (1987); State v. Thurman, 10 Conn. App. 302, 306 , 523 A.2d 891 (1987). 1988State v. Huff, 10 Conn. App. 330, 334 , 523 A.2d 906 (1987); State v. Thurman, 10 Conn. App. 302, 306 , 523 A.2d 891 (1987). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.