record discloses claim (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

record discloses claim in Connecticut

5 Connecticut opinions name it 1 courts 1988–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Hill green
conn · 1986
2 sentences

2019The record discloses that defense counsel also argued that the state had "to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that [the defendant] knew, or had knowledge of, that he was in possession of this weapon, that he knew where it was and that he had access to it." We note that neither argument mirrors State v. Hill , supra, 201 Conn. at 516 , 523 A.2d 1252 ("control is not the manifestation of an act of control but instead it is the act of being in a position of control coupled with the requisite mental intent").

2019The record discloses that defense counsel also argued that the state had "to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that [the defendant] knew, or had knowledge of, that he was in possession of this weapon, that he knew where it was and that he had access to it." We note that neither argument mirrors State v. Hill , supra, 201 Conn. at 516 , 523 A.2d 1252 ("control is not the manifestation of an act of control but instead it is the act of being in a position of control coupled with the requisite mental intent").

12019–2019
State v. Golding green
conn · 1989
2 sentences

1999The defendant also claims that this issue was distinctly raised at trial, but, in the event that it was not properly preserved, he seeks review under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989). 1 Our review of the record discloses that this claim was not properly preserved at trial.

1999The defendant also claims that this issue was distinctly raised at trial, but, in the event that it was not properly preserved, he seeks review under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989). 1 Our review of the record discloses that this claim was not properly preserved at trial.

11999–1999
State v. Murrell green
connappct · 1986
2 sentences

1990State v. Murrell, 7 Conn. App. 75, 91 , 507 A.2d 1033 (1986), and cases cited therein.

1990State v. Murrell, 7 Conn. App. 75, 91 , 507 A.2d 1033 (1986), and cases cited therein.

11990–1990
State v. Taylor green
connappct · 1990
2 sentences

1990State v. Taylor, 23 Conn. App. 426 , 430 n.l, 580 A.2d 1004 (1990), and cases cited therein.

1990State v. Taylor, 23 Conn. App. 426 , 430 n.l, 580 A.2d 1004 (1990), and cases cited therein.

11990–1990
State v. Thurman green
connappct · 1987
2 sentences

1988State v. Huff, 10 Conn. App. 330, 334 , 523 A.2d 906 (1987); State v. Thurman, 10 Conn. App. 302, 306 , 523 A.2d 891 (1987).

1988State v. Huff, 10 Conn. App. 330, 334 , 523 A.2d 906 (1987); State v. Thurman, 10 Conn. App. 302, 306 , 523 A.2d 891 (1987).

11988–1988
State v. Huff green
connappct · 1987
2 sentences

1988State v. Huff, 10 Conn. App. 330, 334 , 523 A.2d 906 (1987); State v. Thurman, 10 Conn. App. 302, 306 , 523 A.2d 891 (1987).

1988State v. Huff, 10 Conn. App. 330, 334 , 523 A.2d 906 (1987); State v. Thurman, 10 Conn. App. 302, 306 , 523 A.2d 891 (1987).

11988–1988

Where else courts name it

NY 36 (1898–2021) CA 36 (1921–2022) TX 29 (1886–2011) IL 25 (1892–2015) WA 16 (1949–2017) KS 13 (1904–1980) MA 10 (1925–1994) MI 10 (1936–2018) AL 10 (1914–2003) MD 9 (1967–2012) FL 8 (1959–1992) NC 8 (1905–2020) ME 7 (1957–2011) PA 7 (1915–1986) OH 6 (1923–2021) CT 5 (1988–2019) IN 5 (1915–1982) ID 5 (1921–2014) GA 5 (1911–1985) OK 5 (1908–1942) MO 4 (1905–1978) NE 3 (1895–1950) RI 3 (1981–2013) MN 3 (1910–1975) LA 3 (1929–2008) OR 3 (1924–2025) VT 2 (1940–1951) AZ 2 (1966–1966) VA 2 (1973–1996) ND 2 (1898–1990) MT 2 (1910–1922)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check