Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Alabama opinions name it 4 courts 1914–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sts v. Ctgreen2 sentences2003See also S.T.S. v. C.T., 746 So.2d 1017 , 1020 (Ala.Civ.App.1999) ("After thoroughly reviewing the juvenile dependency statutes and applicable caselaw, we conclude that this case was primarily a custody dispute and, therefore, did not fall within the scope of the dependency statute."); C.P. v. M.K., 667 So.2d 1357 (Ala.Civ.App. 1994) (after concluding that the action was more in the nature of a custody dispute than a dependency action and that the standard set forth in Ex parte Terry, 494 So.2d 628 (Ala.1986), applied, this court reversed a judgment awarding custody to nonparents). 2003See also S.T.S. v. C.T., 746 So.2d 1017, 1020 (Ala.Civ.App.1999) (“After thoroughly reviewing the juvenile dependency statutes and applicable caselaw, we conclude that this case was primarily a custody dispute and, therefore, did not fall within the scope of the dependency statute.”); C.P. v. M.K., 667 So.2d 1357 (Ala.Civ.App.1994) (after concluding that the action was more in the nature of a custody dispute than a dependency action and that the standard set forth in Ex parte Terry, 494 So.2d 628 (Ala.1986), applied, this court reversed a judgment awarding custody to nonparents). | 4 | 4 |
Bsl v. Segreen2 sentences2003This court has held that "[w]hen a review of the record discloses that the hearing relates to custody rather than to dependency,... the trial court must apply *329 the appropriate custody standard." B.S.L. v. S.E., 826 So.2d 890, 893 (Ala.Civ.App. 2002). 2003This court has held that “[w]hen a review of the record discloses that the hearing relates to custody rather than to dependency, ... the trial court must apply the appropriate custody standard.” B.S.L. v. S.E., 826 So.2d 890, 893 (Ala.Civ.App.2002). | 4 | 4 |
Ex Parte STSgreen2 sentences2002See Ex parte S.T.S., 806 So.2d 336 (Ala.2001); C.P. v. M.K., 667 So.2d 1357 (Ala.Civ.App.1994); Jones v. Webb, 524 So.2d 374 (Ala.Civ.App.1988). 2002See Ex parte S.T.S., 806 So.2d 336 (Ala.2001); C.P. v. M.E, 667 So.2d 1357 (Ala.Civ.App.1994); Jones v. Webb, 524 So.2d 374 (Ala.Civ.App.1988). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cp v. Mk
green
2 sentences2003See also S.T.S. v. C.T., 746 So.2d 1017 , 1020 (Ala.Civ.App.1999) ("After thoroughly reviewing the juvenile dependency statutes and applicable caselaw, we conclude that this case was primarily a custody dispute and, therefore, did not fall within the scope of the dependency statute."); C.P. v. M.K., 667 So.2d 1357 (Ala.Civ.App. 1994) (after concluding that the action was more in the nature of a custody dispute than a dependency action and that the standard set forth in Ex parte Terry, 494 So.2d 628 (Ala.1986), applied, this court reversed a judgment awarding custody to nonparents). 2003See also S.T.S. v. C.T., 746 So.2d 1017, 1020 (Ala.Civ.App.1999) (“After thoroughly reviewing the juvenile dependency statutes and applicable caselaw, we conclude that this case was primarily a custody dispute and, therefore, did not fall within the scope of the dependency statute.”); C.P. v. M.K., 667 So.2d 1357 (Ala.Civ.App.1994) (after concluding that the action was more in the nature of a custody dispute than a dependency action and that the standard set forth in Ex parte Terry, 494 So.2d 628 (Ala.1986), applied, this court reversed a judgment awarding custody to nonparents). | 6 | 2002–2003 |
Ex Parte Terry
green
2 sentences2003See also S.T.S. v. C.T., 746 So.2d 1017 , 1020 (Ala.Civ.App.1999) ("After thoroughly reviewing the juvenile dependency statutes and applicable caselaw, we conclude that this case was primarily a custody dispute and, therefore, did not fall within the scope of the dependency statute."); C.P. v. M.K., 667 So.2d 1357 (Ala.Civ.App. 1994) (after concluding that the action was more in the nature of a custody dispute than a dependency action and that the standard set forth in Ex parte Terry, 494 So.2d 628 (Ala.1986), applied, this court reversed a judgment awarding custody to nonparents). 2003See also S.T.S. v. C.T., 746 So.2d 1017, 1020 (Ala.Civ.App.1999) (“After thoroughly reviewing the juvenile dependency statutes and applicable caselaw, we conclude that this case was primarily a custody dispute and, therefore, did not fall within the scope of the dependency statute.”); C.P. v. M.K., 667 So.2d 1357 (Ala.Civ.App.1994) (after concluding that the action was more in the nature of a custody dispute than a dependency action and that the standard set forth in Ex parte Terry, 494 So.2d 628 (Ala.1986), applied, this court reversed a judgment awarding custody to nonparents). | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Jones v. Webb
green
2 sentences2002See Ex parte S.T.S., 806 So.2d 336 (Ala.2001); C.P. v. M.K., 667 So.2d 1357 (Ala.Civ.App.1994); Jones v. Webb, 524 So.2d 374 (Ala.Civ.App.1988). 2002See Ex parte S.T.S., 806 So.2d 336 (Ala.2001); C.P. v. M.E, 667 So.2d 1357 (Ala.Civ.App.1994); Jones v. Webb, 524 So.2d 374 (Ala.Civ.App.1988). | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.
green
1 sentence1995Rule 56, A.R.Civ.P.; Bass v. South-Trust Bank of Baldwin County , 538 So.2d 794 (Ala. 1989). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Southern Railway Co. v. Hayes
green
2 sentences1978Co. v. Hayes , 198 Ala. 601 , 73 So. 945 ; Torian v. Ashford , 216 Ala. 85 , 112 So. 418 ." The record discloses no error prejudicial to defendant. 1978Co. v. Hayes , 198 Ala. 601 , 73 So. 945 ; Torian v. Ashford , 216 Ala. 85 , 112 So. 418 ." The record discloses no error prejudicial to defendant. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Torian v. Ashford
neutral
2 sentences1978Co. v. Hayes , 198 Ala. 601 , 73 So. 945 ; Torian v. Ashford , 216 Ala. 85 , 112 So. 418 ." The record discloses no error prejudicial to defendant. 1978Co. v. Hayes , 198 Ala. 601 , 73 So. 945 ; Torian v. Ashford , 216 Ala. 85 , 112 So. 418 ." The record discloses no error prejudicial to defendant. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Weeks v. Napier
green
1 sentence1933We tliink that this record discloses a waiver under the rule laid down in Weeks v. Napier, 33 Ala. 568 , and other cases cited. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Loudermilk v. State
neutral
2 sentences1914As to its sentence of the defendant to hard labor for the payment of the costs, the judgment was erroneous because of its failure to show the court’s determination of the time required to work out the costs at the statuory rate; and that part of the judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded in order that the trial court may enter the proper judgment and sentence as to the costs.— Code, § 7635; Loudermilk v. State, 4 Ala. App. 167 , 58 South. 180 . 1914As to its sentence of the defendant to hard labor for the payment of the costs, the judgment was erroneous because of its failure to show the court’s determination of the time required to work out the costs at the statuory rate; and that part of the judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded in order that the trial court may enter the proper judgment and sentence as to the costs.— Code, § 7635; Loudermilk v. State, 4 Ala. App. 167 , 58 South. 180 . | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.