Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1965–1997 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Garner v. Horkley Oilgreen2 sentences1997Garner v. Horkley Oil, 123 Idaho 831, 833 , 853 P.2d 576, 578 (1993) (citing Simplot, 120 Idaho at 862 , 820 P.2d at 1219 ). 1997Garner v. Horkley Oil, 123 Idaho 831, 833 , 853 P.2d 576, 578 (1993) (citing Simplot, 120 Idaho at 862 , 820 P.2d at 1219 ). | 1 | 1 |
Betts v. Board of Administrationgreen2 sentences1983Sys., 21 Cal.3d 859 , 148 Cal.Rptr. 158, 161 , 582 P.2d 614, 617 (Cal.1978), decided twenty years after Abbott v. San Diego, supra, the court summarized the principle which must be considered by the courts in determining whether a modification is reasonable: “However, there is a strict limitation on the conditions which may modify the *807 pension system in effect during employment. 1983Sys., 21 Cal.3d 859 , 148 Cal.Rptr. 158, 161 , 582 P.2d 614, 617 (Cal.1978), decided twenty years after Abbott v. San Diego, supra, the court summarized the principle which must be considered by the courts in determining whether a modification is reasonable: “However, there is a strict limitation on the conditions which may modify the *807 pension system in effect during employment. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lopezgreen2 sentences1979Recently in State v. Lopez, 98 Idaho 581, 590 , 570 P.2d 259, 268 (1977), on rehearing, this Court summarized the doctrine: The concept of void-for-vagueness arose from a common law practice of refusing to enforce legislation deemed too indefinite to be applied. 1979Recently in State v. Lopez, 98 Idaho 581, 590 , 570 P.2d 259, 268 (1977), on rehearing, this Court summarized the doctrine: The concept of void-for-vagueness arose from a common law practice of refusing to enforce legislation deemed too indefinite to be applied. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Commission
green
2 sentences1997Garner v. Horkley Oil, 123 Idaho 831, 833 , 853 P.2d 576, 578 (1993) (citing Simplot, 120 Idaho at 862 , 820 P.2d at 1219 ). 1997Garner v. Horkley Oil, 123 Idaho 831, 833 , 853 P.2d 576, 578 (1993) (citing Simplot, 120 Idaho at 862 , 820 P.2d at 1219 ). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
McCarty v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
green
2 sentences1985The court, however, ruled that the going and coming rule did "not apply if the approved consumption of alcohol on the employer's premises proximately caused the accident." Id. 117 Cal. Rptr. at 66 , 527 P.2d at 618 . *61 The court summarized its analysis by stating that "if the proximate cause is of industrial origin, the time and place of injury or death even if foreign to the premises does not serve to nullify recovery." Id. 117 Cal. Rptr. at 67 , 527 P.2d at 619 . 1985The court, however, ruled that the going and coming rule did "not apply if the approved consumption of alcohol on the employer's premises proximately caused the accident." Id. 117 Cal. Rptr. at 66 , 527 P.2d at 618 . *61 The court summarized its analysis by stating that "if the proximate cause is of industrial origin, the time and place of injury or death even if foreign to the premises does not serve to nullify recovery." Id. 117 Cal. Rptr. at 67 , 527 P.2d at 619 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Elsen
green
1 sentence1965At page 54 of 68 Idaho, at page 978 of 187 P.2d the court summarized the test of corroboration as: “Aside from instances where the testimony of the prosecutrix is obtained through fear, threats, coercion or duress, the law stated in the foregoing cases may be summarized to this effect: If the character or reputation of the prosecutrix for truth and chastity is unimpeached, and her testimony is not contradictory nor inconsistent with the admitted facts of the case, and is not inherently improbable nor incredible, there can be either direct evidence corroborating heir testimony, or evidence of s | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.