Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1955–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Reber v. Reissgreen2 sentences2013Under the circumstances, the court found that “the balancing approach [was] the most suitable test” and concluded that the balance of interests weighed in the wife’s favor because “Husband and Wife never made an agreement prior to undergoing IVF, and these pre-embryos are likely Wife’s only opportunity to achieve biological parenthood and her best chance to achieve parenthood at all.” Reber, 42 A.3d at 1136, 1142 . ¶ 37 Courts applying the balancing approach have noted that a party’s inability to have a child weighs in his or her favor. 2013See Reber, 42 A.3d at 1140 ; Davis, 842 S.W.2d at 604 (noting that “[t]he case would be closer if [wife] were seeking to use the preembryos herself, but only if she could not achieve parenthood by any other reasonable means”); but see J.B. v. M.B., 783 A.2d 707, 720 (N.J. 2001) (expressing “no opinion in respect of a case in which a party who has become infertile seeks use of stored preembryos against the wishes of his or her partner, noting only that the possibility of adoption also may be a consideration, among others, in the court’s assessment”). | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Davisgreen1 sentence2013See Reber, 42 A.3d at 1140 ; Davis, 842 S.W.2d at 604 (noting that “[t]he case would be closer if [wife] were seeking to use the preembryos herself, but only if she could not achieve parenthood by any other reasonable means”); but see J.B. v. M.B., 783 A.2d 707, 720 (N.J. 2001) (expressing “no opinion in respect of a case in which a party who has become infertile seeks use of stored preembryos against the wishes of his or her partner, noting only that the possibility of adoption also may be a consideration, among others, in the court’s assessment”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jb v. Mbgreen1 sentence2013See Reber, 42 A.3d at 1140 ; Davis, 842 S.W.2d at 604 (noting that “[t]he case would be closer if [wife] were seeking to use the preembryos herself, but only if she could not achieve parenthood by any other reasonable means”); but see J.B. v. M.B., 783 A.2d 707, 720 (N.J. 2001) (expressing “no opinion in respect of a case in which a party who has become infertile seeks use of stored preembryos against the wishes of his or her partner, noting only that the possibility of adoption also may be a consideration, among others, in the court’s assessment”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Ambrose
green
2 sentences2002This is not such a case." Ambrose , 28 Ill. 2002This is not such a case.” Ambrose, 28 Ill. | 2 | 1981–2002 |
The People v. Lobb
green
2 sentences1997People v. Lobb, 17 Ill. 2d 287, 300 , 161 N.E.2d 325 (1959). 1997People v. Lobb, 17 Ill. 2d 287, 300 , 161 N.E.2d 325 (1959). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Consolidated Ice Machine Co. v. Keifer
green
1 sentence1955Co. v. Keifer, 134 Ill. 481, 494 , under which, in the instant case, there was no error in admitting testimony, proper to one defendant, so long as the other defendant was protected by a suitable instruction. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.