assignee claim in Indiana

5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1893–1999 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
Allstate Insurance v. Axsomgreen indctapp · 1998 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999 1 sentence 1999See, e.g., Allstate, 696 N.E.2d 482 (injured party as the assignee of a claim the tortfeasor-insured could have maintained against the insurer); Plumlee v. Monroe Guaranty Ins.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

Case	Cited	Years
Moore-Mansfield Construction Co. v. Marion, Bluffton & Eastern Traction Co. green indctapp · 1913 2 sentences 1968Moore-Mansfield Construction Co. v. Marion Bluffton & Eastern Traction Co., et al. (1913), 52 Ind. App. 548 , 101 N. E. 15 . 1968Moore-Mansfield Construction Co. v. Marion Bluffton & Eastern Traction Co., et al. (1913), 52 Ind. App. 548 , 101 N. E. 15 .	2	1968–1968
Plumlee v. Monroe Guaranty Insurance Co. green indctapp · 1995 1 sentence 1999Co., 655 N.E.2d 350 (Ind.Ct.App.1995) (injured party as the tortfeasor’s assignee brought breach of contract and negligence action against the tortfeasor’s liability insurer).	1	1999–1999
Board of Commissioners v. Jarnecke neutral ind · 1905 1 sentence 1906It was said by this court, in Board, etc., v. Jarnecke (1905), 164 Ind. 658 , 664: “The rule is well settled that where a party seeks to avail himself of a statutory remedy, he must bring himself substantially within the provisions of the act awarding such remedy.	1	1906–1906
Bingham v. Stage neutral · 1890 1 sentence 1893And all actions by assignees shall be without prejudice to any set-off or other defense existing at the time of or before notice of the assignment, except actions on negotiable promissory notes and bills of exchange,'transferred in good faith and upon good consideration before due.” The case of Bingham, Admr., v. Stage, 123 Ind. 281 , is not in conflict with this opinion.	1	1893–1893

Where else courts name it

NY 31 (1888–2002) TX 11 (1959–2025) IL 10 (1916–2024) CO 7 (1941–2026) OH 7 (1901–2025) CA 6 (1921–2023) WA 5 (1910–2013) MA 5 (1889–1998) IN 5 (1893–1999) OK 5 (1918–2000) MI 5 (2001–2022) NJ 4 (1925–2002) PA 3 (2004–2014) AZ 3 (1965–2010) GA 3 (1931–1939) IA 3 (1925–1985) MO 3 (1873–2021) TN 2 (2001–2022) UT 2 (1941–2017) KY 2 (1932–1942) NM 2 (1922–1933) FL 2 (1966–1971) NC 2 (1914–1978)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check