Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 2012–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cartwright v. Stategreen2 sentences2019It is therefore accorded great deference." Highler v. State , 854 N.E.2d 823 , 828 (Ind. 2006). [12] "Pursuant to Batson and its progeny, a trial court must engage in a three-step process in evaluating a claim that a peremptory challenge was based on race." Cartwright , 962 N.E.2d at 1220 . 2012On the same day that our supreme court issued its opinion in Addison, it also issued an opinion in Cartwright v. State, 82S01-1109-CR-564, 2012 WL 560086 (Ind. Feb. 22, 2012), in which the court noted that “[p]ursuant to Batson and its progeny, a trial court must engage in a three-step process in evaluating a claim that a peremptory challenge was based on race.” Id., slip op. at 4. | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Addison v. State
green
2 sentences2019At the first step, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that there are "circumstances raising an inference that discrimination occurred." Addison , 962 N.E.2d at 1208 . 2019“Pursuant to Batson and its progeny, a trial court must engage in a three-step process in evaluating a claim that a peremptory challenge was based on race.” Cartwright, 962 N.E.2d at 1220 . | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Snyder v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences2012“First, a defendant must make a prima *1221 facie showing that a peremptory challenge has been exercised on the basis of race; second, if that showing has been made, the prosecution must offer a race-neutral basis for striking the juror in question; and third, in light of the parties’ submissions, the trial court must determine whether the defendant has shown purposeful discrimination.” Snyder, 552 U.S. at 476-77 , 128 S.Ct. 1203 (quoting Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231, 277 , 125 S.Ct. 2317 , 162 L.Ed.2d 196 (2005)). 2012“First, a defendant must make a prima *1221 facie showing that a peremptory challenge has been exercised on the basis of race; second, if that showing has been made, the prosecution must offer a race-neutral basis for striking the juror in question; and third, in light of the parties’ submissions, the trial court must determine whether the defendant has shown purposeful discrimination.” Snyder, 552 U.S. at 476-77 , 128 S.Ct. 1203 (quoting Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231, 277 , 125 S.Ct. 2317 , 162 L.Ed.2d 196 (2005)). | 2 | 2012–2012 |
Highler v. State
green
1 sentence2019It is therefore accorded great deference." Highler v. State , 854 N.E.2d 823 , 828 (Ind. 2006). [12] "Pursuant to Batson and its progeny, a trial court must engage in a three-step process in evaluating a claim that a peremptory challenge was based on race." Cartwright , 962 N.E.2d at 1220 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Miller-El v. Dretke
green
2 sentences2012“First, a defendant must make a prima *1221 facie showing that a peremptory challenge has been exercised on the basis of race; second, if that showing has been made, the prosecution must offer a race-neutral basis for striking the juror in question; and third, in light of the parties’ submissions, the trial court must determine whether the defendant has shown purposeful discrimination.” Snyder, 552 U.S. at 476-77 , 128 S.Ct. 1203 (quoting Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231, 277 , 125 S.Ct. 2317 , 162 L.Ed.2d 196 (2005)). 2012“First, a defendant must make a prima *1221 facie showing that a peremptory challenge has been exercised on the basis of race; second, if that showing has been made, the prosecution must offer a race-neutral basis for striking the juror in question; and third, in light of the parties’ submissions, the trial court must determine whether the defendant has shown purposeful discrimination.” Snyder, 552 U.S. at 476-77 , 128 S.Ct. 1203 (quoting Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231, 277 , 125 S.Ct. 2317 , 162 L.Ed.2d 196 (2005)). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.