Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 48 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Enrique Cuevas-Gaspar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Enrique Cuevas-Gaspar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General Anchor | red | “so great as to be dispositive,” | 9 |
| 2 | Maria Corazon Senica Evangeline S. Senica Virgilio S. Senica Cherry S. Senica v. Immigration & Naturalization Service | green | “the bia's decision here was not a departure from its previous practice of imputing a parent's state of mind, or failure to reasonably investigate, to an une- mancipated minor child.” | 7 |
| 3 | Ramos-Lopez v. Holder | red | “al- leged no facts in support of a political opinion, actual or imputed, beyond his refusal to join the gang,” | 7 |
| 4 | Benjamin Lepe-Guitron v. Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “bonds between parents and their children who had resided legally in the united states for the better part of their lives,” | 5 |
| 5 | Benjamin Lepe-Guitron v. Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “formed strong ties to the united states.” | 5 |
| 6 | Dao Vang v. Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “look to whether the minor's parents have firmly resettled in a foreign country before com- ing to the united states, and then derivatively attribute the parents' status to the minor,” | 5 |
| 7 | Ramos-Lopez v. Holder | red | “to the bia's determination that 'resistance to a gang's recruitment efforts alone does not constitute political opinion.” | 5 |
| 8 | Dhital v. Mukasey | green | “section 106 of the real id act of 2005 restored our jurisdiction over 'constitutional claims or questions of law' raised in a petition for review.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.