Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 47 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dunn v. Menard, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dunn v. Menard, Inc. Anchor | green | “a genuine dispute of material fact exists if 'the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 24 |
| 2 | Spivey v. Adaptive Marketing LLC | green | “summary judgment is appropriate 'if the pleadings, the discovery and disclosure materials on file, and any affidavits show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.” | 19 |
| 3 | LuzMaria Arroyo v. Volvo Group North America, LLC | green | “arroyo did include the emails and other materials in the record, so we are free to consider them.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.