Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 47 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Salsitz v. Kreiss.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Salsitz v. Kreiss Anchor | green | “an order of the circuit court to compel or stay arbitration is injunctive in nature and subject to interlocutory appeal under paragraph (a)(1) of rule 307.” | 12 |
| 2 | Shell Oil Co. v. Department of Revenue | green | “it is axiomatic that questions not raised in the trial court are waived and may not be raised for the first time on appeal.” | 9 |
| 3 | Rogers v. Tyson Foods, Inc. | green | “a stay is considered injunctive in nature, and thus an order granting or denying a stay fits squarely within rule 307(a).” | 8 |
| 4 | Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent MacHine Corp. | green | “it has long been held that arguments not raised in the trial court are considered waived on appeal.” | 7 |
| 5 | Cook v. General Electric Co. | green | “while a strong policy preference for a joint trial is implicit in laue, and we now reiterate that policy, laue requires only that claims for contribution be asserted in the pending action, not that there must inevitably be a joint trial in every case.” | 5 |
| 6 | Bohn Aluminum & Brass Co. v. Barker | green | “even if defendant had not used the open-sesame word” | 3 |
| 7 | Marsh v. Illinois Racing Board | green | “the issuance of a stay of an administrative order pending judicial review constitutes an injunction for purposes of an appeal under supreme court rule 307(a)(1).” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.