Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 47 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Geft Outdoors, LLC v. City of Westfield.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Geft Outdoors, LLC v. City of Westfield Anchor | green | “if a plaintiff is more likely to win, the balance of harms can weigh less heavily in its favor, but the less likely a plaintiff is to win the more that balance would need to weigh in its favor.” | 27 |
| 2 | Courthouse News Services v. Dorothy Brown | green | “ultimately, the moving party bears the burden of showing that a preliminary injunction is warranted.” | 11 |
| 3 | Courthouse News Services v. Dorothy Brown | green | “whether the preliminary injunction is in the public interest, which entails taking into account any effects on non-parties.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.