7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Welch v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Welch v. United States Anchor | green | “johnson is ... a substantive decision and so has retroactive effect under teague in cases on collateral review.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Booker | green | “as booker correctly notes, the government's position conflates (1) authorization to file a second or successive motion under section 2255(h), (2) the time bar under section 2255(f)(3), and (3) the merits of the motion.” | 4 |
| 3 | Jerome Raybon v. United States | green | “we conclude that his claim is not timely under 28 u.s.c. 2255 (f)(3).” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Thilo Brown | green | “we are thus compelled to affirm the dismissal of petitioner's motion as untimely under 28 u.s.c. 2255 (f)(3).” | 4 |
| 5 | United States v. Greer | green | “mr. greer's interpretation of snyder would require this court to find that, no matter what the underlying claim, any petitioner can avoid aedpa's clear time limits simply by invoking a right newly recognized by the supreme court.” | 4 |
| 6 | United States v. Greer | green | “othing in johnson speaks to the issue.” | 4 |
| 7 | United States v. Antonio Blackstone | green | “as of now, however, blackstone's motion is untimely.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.