Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 46 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from John R. Neal and Lea A. Neal v. Sjef Janssen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John R. Neal and Lea A. Neal v. Sjef Janssen Anchor | green | “the acts of making phone calls and sending facsimiles into the forum, standing alone, may be sufficient to confer jurisdiction on the foreign defendant where the phone calls and faxes form the bases for the action.” | 19 |
| 2 | Caesars Riverboat Casino, LLC v. Beach | green | “the cause of action arises from conduct or activity of the defendant that fits into one of the long-arm statute's enumerated categories.” | 17 |
| 3 | Air Products & Controls, Inc. v. Safetech International, Inc. | green | “in that instance, the pleadings and affidavits submitted must be viewed in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, and the district court should not weigh the controverting assertions of the party seeking dismissal.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.