Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 48 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kermit Oris Bear Stops v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kermit Oris Bear Stops v. United States Anchor | green | “to prevail on a 2255 motion, the petitioner must demonstrate a violation of the constitution or the laws of the united states.” | 8 |
| 2 | Don William Davis v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction | green | “to satisfy this prong the movant must overcome the strong presumption that his counsel's conduct fell within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” | 8 |
| 3 | United States v. Darius M. Moss | green | “the supreme court recognized in bousley that 'a claim that "is so novel that its legal basis is not reasonably available to counsel” | 7 |
| 4 | Stanley Boysiewick v. Dora Schriro | green | “do not ... need to address the performance prong if petitioner does not affirmatively prove prejudice.” | 7 |
| 5 | United States v. Larry D. Hughes | green | “when claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel are asserted on direct appeal, we ordinarily defer them to 28 u.s.c. 2255 proceedings.” | 6 |
| 6 | United States v. Corey Hilliard | green | “we review the district court's decision to grant or deny relief on a petitioner's ineffective assistance of counsel claim de novo.” | 6 |
| 7 | United States v. Juan Gerardo Hernandez, Also Known as Chapin | green | “any underlying fact-findings are reviewed for clear error.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.