Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 84 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ingram v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ingram v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration Anchor | green | “action, findings, or conclusion is contrary to the weight of the evidence,” | 59 |
| 2 | Joyce Hargress v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner | green | “nothing in these new medical records indicates the doctors considered the claimant's past medical records or that the information in them relates to the period at issue, which materially distinguishes this case from washington.” | 17 |
| 3 | Raymond Lamar Burgin vs Commissioner of Social Security | green | “because a reviewing court must evaluate the claimant's evidence anew, the ac is not required to provide a thorough explanation when denying review” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.