Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 45 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hathaway v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hathaway v. State Anchor | green | “a petitioner must show that an impediment external to the defense prevented him or her from complying with the state procedural default rules.” | 24 |
| 2 | State v. Huebler | green | “a petitioner must show that errors in the proceedings underlying the judgment worked to the petitioner's actual and substantial disadvantage.” | 5 |
| 3 | Lozada v. State | green | “ensure that claims are raised before evidence is lost or memories fade.” | 4 |
| 4 | Lozada v. State | green | “mlle required showing of prejudice to establish a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is separate and distinct from the showing of prejudice required to overcome a procedural default.” | 4 |
| 5 | Brown v. McDaniel | green | “nevada's post-conviction statutes contemplate the filing of one post-conviction petition to challenge a conviction or sentence.” | 4 |
| 6 | Brown v. McDaniel | green | “the purpose of the single post-conviction remedy and the statutory procedural bars is 'to ensure that petitioners would be limited to one time through the post-conviction system.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.