Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 44 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lester C. McLawhorn v. John W. Daniel & Company, Incorporated.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lester C. McLawhorn v. John W. Daniel & Company, Incorporated Anchor | green | “we have held on several occasions that a rule 60(b) motion is not timely brought when it is made three to four months after the original judgment and no valid reason is given for the delay.” | 28 |
| 2 | Jeffrey Coleman v. John Jabe | green | “must make a threshold showing of timeliness, 'a meritorious claim or defense,' and lack of unfair prejudice to the opposing party.” | 13 |
| 3 | Davis v. Kelley | green | “has failed to present extraordinary circumstances mirroring those demonstrated in buck.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.