Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 44 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Royster-Clark, Inc. v. Olsen's Mill, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Royster-Clark, Inc. v. Olsen's Mill, Inc. Anchor | green | “a circuit court's findings of fact are clearly erroneous when the finding is against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence.” | 22 |
| 2 | Royster-Clark, Inc. v. Olsen's Mill, Inc. | green | “under the clearly erroneous standard, 'even though the evidence would permit a contrary finding, findings of fact will be affirmed on appeal as long as the evidence would permit a reasonable person to make the same finding.” | 19 |
| 3 | Noll v. Dimiceli's, Inc. | green | “on review of a factual determination made by a circuit court without a jury, an appellate court will not reverse unless the finding is clearly erroneous.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.