Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bella Palma, Llc v. Mark Young.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bella Palma, Llc v. Mark Young Anchor | green | “a trial court may express its intent to render a final judgment by describing its action as (1) final, (2) a disposition of all claims and parties, and (3) appealable.” | 31 |
| 2 | Virendra Patel, Premier West Hospitality Corp., Zeal Hotels Group LLC, the Colony Hospitality Corp., and Huntley Construction, Llc v. Nations Renovations, Llc | green | “if the judgment clearly and unequivocally states that it finally disposes of all claims and parties, the assessment is resolved in favor of finding finality, and the reviewing court cannot review the record.” | 8 |
| 3 | Martinez v. Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. | green | “when the problem is that an otherwise final judgment fails to dispose of all parties, the trial court may make the judgment final for purposes of appeal by severing the causes and parties disposed of by the judgment into a different cause.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.