Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Cardenas-Flores.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Cardenas-Flores Anchor | green | “evidence is sufficient to support a guilty verdict if any rational trier of fact, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, could find the elements of the charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 29 |
| 2 | State v. Chacon | green | “bears the burden of proving every element of every crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 7 |
| 3 | State v. Cardenas-Flores | green | “the corpus delicti 'must be proved by evidence sufficient to support the inference that' a crime took place, and the defendant's confession 'alone is not sufficient to establish that a crime took place.” | 4 |
| 4 | State v. Hernandez | green | “we consider both circumstantial and direct evidence as equally reliable and defer to the trier of fact on issues of conflicting testimony, witness credibility, and the persuasiveness of the evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.