Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health Care.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health Care Anchor | green | “to preserve the status quo until the rights of the parties can be determined after a full hearing on the merits.” | 15 |
| 2 | Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health Care | green | “a reasonable degree of probability of success.” | 12 |
| 3 | Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health Care | green | “the need to show an irreparable loss unless the status quo is preserved has also been often mentioned.” | 12 |
| 4 | Waterbury Teachers Ass'n v. Freedom of Information Commission | green | “(1) the plaintiff had no adequate legal remedy; (2) the plaintiff would suffer irreparable injury absent a stay; (3) the plaintiff was likely to prevail; and (4) the balance of the equities favored a stay.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.