Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Revert v. Ray.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Revert v. Ray Anchor | green | “a question of fact to be determined from all the surrounding circumstances.” | 10 |
| 2 | In Re Waters of Manse Spring | green | “is the relinquishment of the right by the owner with the intention to forsake and desert it.” | 9 |
| 3 | In Re Waters of Manse Spring | green | “to refrain from infringing upon rights which had accrued at that time, so as to avoid any question of the constitutionality of the act.” | 7 |
| 4 | State v. Morros | green | “nevada water law recognizes and permits water appropriation in situ, without a diversion, for public recreation purposes” | 4 |
| 5 | Application of Filippini | green | “special in character, and the provisions of such law not only lay down the method of procedure but strictly limits it to that provided.” | 4 |
| 6 | United States v. Cappaert | green | “in the manner provided in this chapter, and not otherwise” | 4 |
| 7 | United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co. | green | “appropriated water must be applied to irrigation; it cannot be severed as a commodity for use on land to which it would not be appurtenant.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.