Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Doe v. Salisbury University.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Doe v. Salisbury University Anchor | green | “to satisfy federal pleading standards, a plaintiff must specifically allege each defamatory statement.” | 20 |
| 2 | Gainsburg v. Steben & Co. | green | “every alleged defamatory statement constitutes 'a separate instance of defamation,' which 'a plaintiff must specifically allege.” | 11 |
| 3 | Litz v. Maryland Department of the Environment | green | “based on the assertion that the cause of action is barred by the statute of limitations unless it is clear from the facts and allegations on the face of the complaint that the statute of limitations has run.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.