Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Morocho v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Home Equity Renovations, Inc.).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morocho v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Home Equity Renovations, Inc.) Anchor | green | “scope of review is limited to determining whether constitutional rights have been violated, whether an error of law was committed and whether necessary findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence.” | 15 |
| 2 | Craftsmen v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board | green | “medical evidence is considered unequivocal if the medical expert, after providing a foundation, testifies that in his medical opinion, he thinks the facts exist.” | 9 |
| 3 | Hawbaker v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board | green | “neither the board nor this court may reweigh the evidence or the wcj's credibility determinations.” | 7 |
| 4 | Frankiewicz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Kinder Morgan, Inc.) | green | “with respect to a claim petition, the claimant bears the initial burden of proving that an injury arose in the course of employment and was related thereto.” | 5 |
| 5 | Frankiewicz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Kinder Morgan, Inc.) | green | “generally, if there is no obvious relationship between the disability and the work-related cause, unequivocal medical testimony is required to meet this burden of proof.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.