Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Myles v. Laffitte.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Myles v. Laffitte Anchor | green | “should be used sparingly and . . . its requirements must be strictly construed.” | 14 |
| 2 | Fontell v. Hassett | green | “the prior judgment cannot be 'just maybe or probably wrong; it must . . . strike the court as wrong with the force of a five-week-old, unrefrigerated dead fish.” | 13 |
| 3 | McGlotten v. Connally | green | “distinctions as to the method of distribution of federal funds or their equivalent seem beside the point” | 3 |
| 4 | In re: Donald Trump | green | “when a district court determines that the statutory criteria are present, . . . it has a "duty . . . to allow an immediate appeal to be taken.” | 3 |
| 5 | Goodman v. Archbishop Curley High School, Inc. | green | “substantial doubt' that the district court's order was correct.” | 3 |
| 6 | President of Georgetown College v. Madden | green | “a district court's order denying a motion for summary judgment or denying a motion to dismiss is interlocutory and may be appealed only (a) if the district court certifies under 28 u.s.c. 1292 (b) that the order involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substa…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.