Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Antonio Harris.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Antonio Harris Anchor | green | “the 3553(a) factors in first step act sentencing may include consideration of the defendant's advisory range under the current guidelines.” | 8 |
| 2 | United States v. Brandon Gravatt | green | “we decline to expand the limitations crafted by congress.” | 7 |
| 3 | United States v. Minas Litos | green | “a criminal sentence is a package composed of several parts.” | 6 |
| 4 | United States v. Bobby Venable | green | “drug conviction under 21 u.s.c. 841 (a) falls within the first step act's definition of 'covered offense,' meaning that so long as he is serving any part of his sentence for that offense, he is eligible for a reduction” | 6 |
| 5 | United States v. Smith | green | “the change in 841(b)(1)(c)'s upper bound is no small point, even for defendants guilty of distributing less than five grams of crack, because the statutory benchmarks likely have an anchoring effect on a sentencing judge's decision making.” | 6 |
| 6 | United States v. Terrance Shaw | green | “the statutory minimum and maximum often anchor a court's choice of a suitable sentence,” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.