Topic: are not required to indulge unwarranted inferences. · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #123

9 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 2,129 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Doe I v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Doe I v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Anchor
ca9 · 2009
green “are not required to indulge unwarranted inferences.” 891
2 J. Wilkerson v. B. Wheeler
ca9 · 2014
green “right to challenge the magistrate's factual findings” 327
3 Lance Jett v. M. Penner, D. Peterson, and Cheryl K. Pliler, Warden
ca9 · 2006
green “(a) a purposeful act or failure to respond to a prisoner's pain or possible medical need and (b) harm caused by the indifference.” 288
4 Shawna Hartmann v. California Department of Corr.
ca9 · 2013
green “a district court may deny leave to amend when amendment would be futile.” 249
5 Lance Jett v. M. Penner, D. Peterson, and Cheryl K. Pliler, Warden
ca9 · 2006
green “under 42 u.s.c. 1983 , to maintain an eighth amendment claim based on prison medical treatment, an inmate must show 'deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.” 179
6 Kenneth O. Ashelman v. Hon. Gary Pope, Judge Division I, Mohave County Superior Court Mohave County Attorney's Office
ca9 · 1986
green “judges and those performing judge-like functions are absolutely immune from damage liability for acts performed in their official capacities.” 66
7 Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
ca9 · 1996
green “verbal harassment generally does not violate the eighth amendment.” 55
8 Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D. William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. Estes
ca9 · 1997
green “may well 10 have fared better-particularly in the realm of discovery and the securing of expert testimony” 50
9 John Colwell v. Robert Bannister
ca9 · 2014
green “a prison official is deliberately indifferent under the subjective element of the test only if the official 'knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health and safety.” 24

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check