Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 361 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human Services Anchor | green | “the reviewing court cannot tell if significant probative evidence was not credited or simply ignored.” | 212 |
| 2 | Tommaso Fargnoli v. Larry G. Massanari, Commissioner, Social Security Administration | green | “although we do not expect the alj to make reference to every relevant treatment note in a case . . . we do expect the alj, as the factfinder, to consider and evaluate the medical evidence in the record consistent with his responsibilities under the regulations and case law.” | 149 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.