Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 358 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Trap Rock Industries, Inc. v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers, Afl-Cio.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trap Rock Industries, Inc. v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers, Afl-Cio Anchor | green | “a nonmoving party may not 'rest upon mere allegations, general denials or . . . vague statements . . . .” | 88 |
| 2 | Bryan Santini v. Joseph Fuentes | green | “a fact is 'material' under rule 56 if its existence or nonexistence might impact the outcome of the suit under the applicable substantive law.” | 81 |
| 3 | Bryan Santini v. Joseph Fuentes | green | “a dispute over a material fact is 'genuine' if 'a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 63 |
| 4 | Woloszyn v. County of Lawrence | green | “more than a scintilla of evidence showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.” | 48 |
| 5 | United States v. Donovan | green | “come forward with specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial and do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts.” | 36 |
| 6 | Pearson v. Component Technology Corporation | green | “summary judgment is proper if there is no genuine issue of material fact and if, viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 33 |
| 7 | Thurston v. Cherry Hill Triplex | green | “the njlad was enacted with the express purpose of protecting civil rights, particularly in the area of employment discrimination, where the njlad declares that the opportunity to gain employment without fear of discrimination is a civil right.” | 5 |
| 8 | Znoski v. Shop-Rite Supermarkets, Inc. | green | “it is not an insurer for the safety of its patrons.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.