Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 38 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Di Fiore v. Scott.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Di Fiore v. Scott Anchor | green | “a party seeking a change in an established custody arrangement must show 'a change in circumstances that reflects a real need for change to ensure the best interests of the child” | 17 |
| 2 | Bryan K.B. v. Destiny S.B. | green | “our authority in determinations of custody is as broad as that of family court” | 8 |
| 3 | Bryan K.B. v. Destiny S.B. | green | “in the interests of judicial economy and the well-being of the child” | 4 |
| 4 | Graham v. Thering | green | “has attained the age of 18, and we therefore dismiss as moot the appeal from the . . . order insofar as it concerned that child” | 3 |
| 5 | Arcarese v. Monachino | green | “the mother's attorney, after conferring with her client, waived any objection. the mother therefore may not raise the issue now after consenting that the judge hear the case” | 3 |
| 6 | York v. Zullich | green | “burden of establishing a change in circumstances sufficient to warrant an inquiry into whether the best interests of the child warranted a change in custody” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.