Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ernest Leon Clemons v. Dougherty County, Georgia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ernest Leon Clemons v. Dougherty County, Georgia Anchor | green | “if the record presents factual issues, the court must not decide them; it must deny the motion and proceed to trial.” | 15 |
| 2 | Runnett v. Shultz | green | “the applicable law for transmitting citizenship to a child born abroad when one parent is a u.s. citizen is the statute that was in effect at the time of the child's birth.” | 14 |
| 3 | N. v. Maatschappij Voor Industriele Waarden v. A. O. Smith Corporation and Armor Elevator Company, Inc. | green | “the range of admissible expert testimony,” | 5 |
| 4 | Thadeus Drozd, A/K/A Adam Passoni v. Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “cannot be accommodated 'in the absence of evidence of a contrary legislative intent.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.