Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from William Barnes v. Carlton Joyner.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | William Barnes v. Carlton Joyner Anchor | green | “to whether the state court's application of law was objectively unreasonable and not simply whether the state court applied the law incorrectly.” | 19 |
| 2 | John Merzbacher v. Bobby Shearin | green | “incorrect by clear and convincing evidence, and that the corresponding factual determination was objectively unreasonable in light of the record before the court.” | 10 |
| 3 | Charles Williams v. Bryan Stirling | green | “the determination must be more than merely incorrect or erroneous.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.