Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais Anchor | green | “the burden is then placed upon the plaintiff to prove by affidavit the basis upon which jurisdiction may be obtained.” | 16 |
| 2 | Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais | green | “a defendant wishing to contest the allegations of the complaint concerning jurisdiction or to raise a contention of minimum contacts must file affidavits in support of his position.” | 11 |
| 3 | Tobacco Merchants Ass'n v. Broin | green | “if no such sworn proof is forthcoming from the plaintiff as to the basis for jurisdiction, the trial court must grant the defendant's motion to dismiss.” | 5 |
| 4 | Tobacco Merchants Ass'n v. Broin | green | “if the plaintiff files a counter-affidavit raising conflicting facts, the trial court should then hold a limited evidentiary hearing to resolve any disputed facts relating to jurisdiction.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.