Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Clark v. Robison.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clark v. Robison Anchor | green | “when a suit may be maintained thereon.” | 9 |
| 2 | Clark v. Robison | green | “a cause of action accrues when a suit may be maintained thereon.” | 6 |
| 3 | Landesman v. General Motors Corp. | green | “that the named representatives of the putative class possess a valid cause of action.” | 5 |
| 4 | A CAB, LLC v. MURRAY | green | “a district court's decision to grant summary judgment is reviewed de novo.” | 5 |
| 5 | PERRY VS. TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. | green | “closely resembles, if it is not in fact, an action for back pay under nrs 608.260.” | 4 |
| 6 | EGGLESTON VS. STUART | green | “a dismissal for failure to state a claim pursuant to nrcp 12(b)(5) is reviewed de novo.” | 4 |
| 7 | A CAB, LLC v. MURRAY | green | “summary judgment is proper if the pleadings and all other evidence on file demonstrate that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.